avatar
Jared (hard "d") @jaredhardd.bsky.social

Murphy is the only reasonable choice. Warren and Sanders are great but they're too old.

sep 1, 2025, 4:53 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
maryhear.bsky.social @maryhear.bsky.social

Warren is 72. Sanders is 83. Murphy is 53. The difference between 53 & 72 is not as wide as the difference between 72 and 83, especially for women, who generally live much longer & are healthier than men. Also, Warren is one of the few women consistently fighting & mentoring others.

sep 1, 2025, 5:28 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
annabellelecter.bsky.social @annabellelecter.bsky.social

I love how we're supposed to pretend that Sanders is young and good on policies. He is neither, he is 100% opposition only, and a review of his record would show that.

sep 3, 2025, 10:39 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Jared (hard "d") @jaredhardd.bsky.social

We need 100% opposition right now. Hell, I'd settle for like 75% opposition at this point.

sep 3, 2025, 1:07 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Jared (hard "d") @jaredhardd.bsky.social

I love Warren, she would be my second choice. But I think Dem voters want the torch passed to the next generation and it should start with leadership.

sep 1, 2025, 6:15 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
maryhear.bsky.social @maryhear.bsky.social

I’m with you on the younger generation taking up the torch. Unfortunately, a lot of the younger candidates are corporate “Abundance” (aka New Reaganomics) Democrats, especially in CA, AZ, WA, & TX where they come out of tech & finance. Warren has been encouraging young women in MA to take her place.

sep 1, 2025, 7:28 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jared (hard "d") @jaredhardd.bsky.social

Yeah that's a concern, but I don't believe Chris Murphy has that problem.

sep 1, 2025, 7:54 pm • 1 0 • view