avatar
Kathryn Tewson @kathryntewson.bsky.social

Those are disputed facts. The factfinder in this case resolved that dispute one way. Others may resolve those disputes differently.

sep 1, 2025, 1:42 pm • 2 0

Replies

avatar
ItsDaniel @gamingwithdaniel.bsky.social

How do you dispute video evidence that clearly shows a chain of events that are undeniable? Kyle had a gun pointed at his head moron. You people don't even know what happened. You've been calling him a murderer since day one, all because deranged liberal media told you so. Pathetic trash.

sep 1, 2025, 1:44 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kathryn Tewson @kathryntewson.bsky.social

Maybe the guy reasonably believed that his use of force was necessary to prevent an unjustified risk of death or serious injury to himself or others. Reasonable belief is a question of fact.

sep 1, 2025, 1:47 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

Kathryn, we know that the guy testified that … Oh wait he couldn’t testify as to his belief as to why he used force against Rittenhouse. Because he was dead.

sep 1, 2025, 1:49 pm • 3 0 • view