It means the life of people is seen much more as a commodity when they're death, compared to things that are actively affecting people It ignores the results, and the warnings that come from it, in favour of what caused said results "Oh it deteriotes mental health" Okay can you also just say
it has caused deaths due to it? That the way it has deteriorated the mental health of people some have commited suicide? How some commited murder (suicides) due to paranoia? HOW WE HAVE PROOF OF GIRLS GETTING BULLIED BY PEOPLE THEIR SAME AGE, THE YOUNGEST I REMEMBER BEING 12, BECAUSE SOME "BOYS"
TOOK ONE OF HER PHOTOS, FED IT TO THIS STUPID MACHINE, AND PRODUCED CSAM TO BULLY HER???? And the reason we know this? THEY DIED, THEY (TRIED TO) COMMIT SUICIDE, SO MANY OF THEM And the stories I see on this? I saw 2, when this story originally came out And it has been ignored ever since
Advocating for "AI", that it "still has *some* use!" despite everything Advocating against, stating all valid reasons except this loss of life Both are downplaying the worst of it all, dismissing it, and in the end, viewing humans as less than anything not human, and desecrating the death
Advocating for this inherently means that you're fine with the fucked up things it causes, especially death Advocating against it and not talking about it, is dismissing the worst of this, dismissing human lives that have lost, dismissing humans that are being/got abused Dismissing tragedy