I see you sidestepped my question and I'm more confused now. Do you think what Newsome is doing is worse than Trump because the national guard are not currently going after anyone?
I see you sidestepped my question and I'm more confused now. Do you think what Newsome is doing is worse than Trump because the national guard are not currently going after anyone?
Try to keep up. OP implied that CHP, badged and trained law enforcement officers, doing law enforcement was as bad as the National Guard going into DC as a stunt.
I'm trying, but you're not making a point, and not answering questions. I know that OP was suggesting the expanded law enforcement was bad. I agree. ACAB, etc. You're now calling the NG deployment a stunt, diminishing its importance. You don't think it's that bad, is't just a stunt. Right?
It is a stunt. Trained law enforcement doing law enforcement within an area where they have actual jurisdiction is not the same as a wannabe dictator sending troops into a place they have no business being.
At least these were statements, but I still have no answers. You repeated yourself about them not being the same and then ignored the rest. Have a good one
Yes. They are not the same. That is a good thing. It's clear that you see them as equivalent.
I see them both as bad, not equivalent.
Difference is WE have control over these cops going in, not trump if you can't see a difference in that I don't know what to tell you
I don't think we have control over the cops going in, but that would be an excellent point if we did. From the other poster though it seemed like he didn't mind the NG going in cause it's just a stunt and they won't actually go after anyone.
That's a total misread of my position based on a very narrow reading of the word "stunt". It is a stunt. It's also dangerous.
I tried asking you!