avatar
Tyler @repeaterrh.bsky.social

1. Gillibrand is an opportunist and she'd burn her top donors in a second if she thought it would help her politically. 2. There's hundreds of years of history of false allegations of outsized Jewish control. This trope was used to justify the holocaust. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pro...

jun 29, 2025, 6:25 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Tequila Sunset @pepperonidave.bsky.social

Lol yeah saying a lobbyist controls a candidate is just like protocols of Zion you giant idiot.

jun 29, 2025, 6:34 pm • 8 0 • view
avatar
Tequila Sunset @pepperonidave.bsky.social

You know what. Fuck you.

jun 29, 2025, 6:35 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Tyler @repeaterrh.bsky.social

Wow, what a riposte. I'm really re-evaluating my thinking now.

jun 29, 2025, 7:24 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tequila Sunset @pepperonidave.bsky.social

I don't give a shit what you think you pompous asshole.

jun 29, 2025, 7:31 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jamie Dyer ☸️ @jamiedcville.bsky.social

AIPAC is no more "Jewish" than Jerry Falwell was a "Christian". Those terms are masks used by opportunists as camouflage. Conflating Zionists with Jews is antisemitic by definition, especially considering that there are far more non-Jewish Zionists than there are Jewish Zionists.

jun 29, 2025, 7:50 pm • 13 1 • view
avatar
Tyler @repeaterrh.bsky.social

I've never made any claim that AIPAC represents Jews. But there are certainly Jews who work for AIPAC so it's still not okay to use antisemitic tropes to criticize AIPAC's lobbying. There are so many other ways to criticize AIPAC so why stoop to antisemitism?

jun 29, 2025, 7:56 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Jamie Dyer ☸️ @jamiedcville.bsky.social

The only antisemitism here is the link to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion that you posted.

jun 29, 2025, 7:59 pm • 10 0 • view