"High-efficiency solar cells produced from earth-abundant materials are an exception and have the potential to provide many tens of terawatts on a few percent of the Earth’s surface." ...
"High-efficiency solar cells produced from earth-abundant materials are an exception and have the potential to provide many tens of terawatts on a few percent of the Earth’s surface." ...
& "The ethical and pragmatic path toward a just and sustainable global energy economy requires that human beings transition as rapidly as possible to energy sources that are cheap, clean, dense, and abundant."
That paragraph is immediately after one talking about how the only solution capable of doing that is nuclear fission.
Is fission a big part of the Klein & Thompson argument?
Not as big as it was in this 10 years ago, but again, my point is that there is a legacy to their ideas and arguments. That ideas evolve with time is normal, but the framing and positioning matters.
Oh sure, it wasn't going to be /sui generis/. I guess the hyperlocal context to my very original comment is that some friends on here and I have been having a discussion about how useful the 'abundance' framing is to left-wing/progressive causes and I've been on the skeptical side.
And tl;dr I guess I was more right to be skeptical than I knew.
Although having said that, even the eco-modernists seem like they would likely be frustrated by the Tesla statement, given how much it seems to be giving lip-service to their words while slow-walking any promise of implementation (not usually a Tesla hallmark!)
Quite possibly, yes. Though as that last Nordhaus link shows, they also seem preoccupied with identifying their opponents over pursuing their stated goals, sometimes. (That's the text of a conference keynote, mind you.)
The ecomodernists look clearly part of the same intellectual milieu as Klein & Thompson, but, well, there's a lot of people who are part of that milieu, myself as a very junior member but nevertheless included.
They have a lot of reasonable ideas but the way they talk about them - and about those who disagree with them (not a problem unique to them, granted!) - gives space for cooptation and extremism.