By contrast, here is the statute on which the children are relying. In no uncertain terms, it says that you cannot remove children without placing them in removal proceedings and giving them lawyers.
Replies
Right and it’s insane to suggest that the title 6 provision displaces that!!!
sep 1, 2025, 1:11 pm • 55 1 • view
Some of these lawyers really must never plan to work out in the world again after the Trump administration.
sep 1, 2025, 1:52 pm • 3 0 • view
Am I legally allowed to file this video as an amicus brief? www.tiktok.com/t/ZT6GobR6F/
sep 1, 2025, 1:47 pm • 9 0 • view
I feel like we as a society need to come to appreciate season 6 of Community more.
sep 1, 2025, 1:51 pm • 5 0 • view
I am very eager to see the DOJ brief explaining the "humanitarian" work around they did...
sep 1, 2025, 1:05 pm • 1 0 • view
I’m not a lawyer, but the way these laws are written it just seems like everything is right and nothing is at the same time. I know some things are supposed to take precedent, but it’s crazy to me how many laws cited by the gov seem to directly contradict with other laws
sep 1, 2025, 6:47 pm • 4 0 • view
I suppose. But imagine I told you (1) you're allowed to go grocery shopping and (2) you have to ask me before buying steak. You cannot show up with unexpected steak and say, “you said I had grocery shopping powers!”
sep 1, 2025, 6:56 pm • 10 0 • view
I think the government may argue that ORR isn't part of DHS.
sep 1, 2025, 7:06 pm • 0 0 • view
Yeah, but I think the immigration lawyers agree that ORR has no general immigration or repatriation authority. They're just taking care of the kids while DHS manages their immigration issues. bsky.app/profile/joed...
sep 1, 2025, 7:19 pm • 1 0 • view
That’s a really good way to put it, thanks!
sep 1, 2025, 7:00 pm • 2 0 • view
But when the supreme court only listens to the arguments that support their conclusions will this hold up?
sep 1, 2025, 12:53 pm • 3 0 • view
At the very least, they’d have to show that in each and every case, they knew where the child’s parent was and had communicated with them about the child’s imminent arrival. Which of course they DID NOT DO.
sep 1, 2025, 1:40 pm • 2 0 • view
For now, it doesn't matter much what the Supreme Court thinks. And once we get there, I do think the relative quality of these arguments will matter to at least eight justices.
sep 1, 2025, 1:00 pm • 9 0 • view
But it says BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ORR is part of HHS. Does this apply when §279 moves the removal from INS-now-ICE to HHS? It is not obvious to me.
sep 1, 2025, 1:49 pm • 1 0 • view
Ordinarily, these children are in HHS/ORR’ care (not, say, ICE detention), but their immigration matter remains with DHS. www.hhs.gov/programs/soc...
sep 1, 2025, 2:32 pm • 6 1 • view