Yes but that tiny bit of difference still wasn't enough to stop Biden from actively supporting Genocide through weapons and money to Israel. Remember, Biden is the same guy who said in the 90s that if Israel didnt currently exist the US would have to create it.
I think famine is an important difference
It was always heading this way because of that very same out look we just talked about being shared by all 3, Trump, Biden and Kamala.
Heh - I don’t think the Democrats want to deport Gazans to Africa or turn Gaza into a resort
Why do you think that, even while they support all the famine and indiscriminate killing?
I can’t prove a negative (that they don’t think it) but you could easily provide me with proof that they do support what you accuse them of
My proof is their inaction. They have power but only use it selectively.
About which “they” are you speaking?
Democrats.
Democrats do not have power
Not now but they did have.
I am not aware of that. Do you have their statements about this?
Not statements so much as their voting records. The ones who spoke out against Genocide like AOC and Tliab are clearly on record as being against it. The others seem mostly indifferent or worse.
welp www.ohchr.org/en/press-rel...
All Kamala had to do was take 5 minutes and say she would not be continuing their current active support. Thats it. Thats all she had to do. She refused to do it and lost a chunk of voters who can't vote for a person who is being hypocritical or immoral.
Biden's lockstep policy with Netanyahu, who WANTED TRUMP TO WIN, gave Trump that victory. Kamala, forbidden to stray from the dogma. Hence: Netanyahu got his President. How's that for policy? Blaming Dem voters for their defeat when their OWN LEADERS WERE ENABLING THE OPPO is how corrupt this is.
Anyone who sat out the 2024 election helped elect Trump. He is far worse for the Palestinians and the Palestinian Americans who face deportation.
This says to me that you don't understand how moralistic choices work.
And how are you feeling about gerrymandering and the end justifying the means?
Gerrymandering is wrong obviously as it misrepresents. I've never been a believer in the ends justify the means. That is such a slippery slope to put yourself on.
I agree. And I am searching for the moral way. I was a pacifist until Russia invaded Ukraine. And I find myself supporting the “fight fire with fire” approach. But I have reservations and no answers
All we can do is try to make the best decisions with the information we have. For big decisions with lots of lead up time we have research to help us.
Agree