avatar
Brendan McEwen @brendanmcewen.bsky.social

Like, biofuels are prob low GHGs on a very long term (eg 200-500 years - the trees cut for more ag land eventually regrow once you stop using biofuel) But on 20-50 year timeframes, can easily be greater climate forcing than fossil fuels they replace! BS accounting that ILUC emissions are low…

aug 31, 2025, 8:50 pm • 2 0

Replies

avatar
Dinara Ermakova @ermakova.bsky.social

That’s the difference, biofuels keep the carbon cycle alive, nuclear doesn’t. Zero emissions and zero reliance on land use.

sep 1, 2025, 9:42 am • 0 0 • view