Gays won our acceptance in the 80s and 90s by getting normies to accept that our sexuality was based on SEX. When you make the asinine suggestion that it's based on stereotypes you're inching rather close to the claim that homosexuality is a choice.
Replies
Who said anything about stereotypes? And gender expression is a choice, as are all other forms of expression. All contemporary gender scholars agree on that point.
sep 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 0 0 • view
Gender is based entirely on outdated harmful stereotypes. Stereotypes that the feminist movement and later the LGB movement spent decades tearing down. You're absolutely clueless when it comes to feminist/LGB history in America.
sep 1, 2025, 9:37 pm • 0 0 • view
Feminism is inherently trans-inclusive. You're so fucking ignorant it hurts. How did you get through four decades of life willingly keeping yourself this far in the dark?
sep 1, 2025, 9:38 pm • 0 0 • view
You have ZERO clue about the history of feminism. The feminist movement exists because women were told they didn't deserve the same basic rights/dignity as men because of their BIOLOGY and the certain societal roles only women are capable of because of such.
sep 1, 2025, 9:47 pm • 0 0 • view
If I have zero clue, then you have LESS THAN ZERO clues. Biology was always the EXCUSE, it was never the REASON.
sep 1, 2025, 9:51 pm • 0 0 • view
One of the earliest reasons behind the modern feminist movement in the 1800s is because women weren't allowed their own public bathrooms. It wasn't considered "proper" or "ladylike" for women to relieve themselves in public.
sep 1, 2025, 9:45 pm • 0 0 • view
Literally the first "wave" of feminism were the suffragettes aiming to get women the right to vote and stand for political office. The second wave began in the 1960s. Stop lying and making things up when reality doesn't suit your narrative. Also, maybe read a damn book once in a while.
sep 1, 2025, 9:48 pm • 0 0 • view
Nope, it started long before that.
sep 1, 2025, 9:52 pm • 0 0 • view
Can you provide any evidence for that claim? After all, as a devout follower of the religion of Dawkins, you should be very well-versed in citing sources when making claims.
sep 1, 2025, 9:53 pm • 0 0 • view
digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcont...
sep 1, 2025, 9:54 pm • 0 0 • view
Wow, you really don't understand how to read academic literature, do you? Let me help you: this ESSAY details ANECDOTAL experiences of women DURING THE 1950s AND 1960s and focuses on SECOND WAVE feminism. FIRST-WAVE feminism began in the 1840s. You're off by an entire CENTURY, my guy.
sep 1, 2025, 9:59 pm • 0 0 • view
The feminist movement originally started because women, FEMALES were seen as second class citizens expected to always be proper and submit to men, males. It started long before there was ever any confusion that when you said the word woman you meant biological women.
sep 1, 2025, 9:43 pm • 0 0 • view
You're not helping your cause when you call women FEMALES like some kind of incel. Feminism is inherently trans-inclusive because all women suffer under patriarchal social structures. (Many men do, as well!)
sep 1, 2025, 9:46 pm • 0 0 • view
I have to use the term female because science denying misogynistic male rights activists like yourself are confused about what the word woman means.
sep 1, 2025, 9:49 pm • 0 0 • view
I know what the word "woman" means. You're the only one in this conversation who seems confused.
sep 1, 2025, 9:50 pm • 0 0 • view
Ok then, what does it mean?
sep 1, 2025, 9:57 pm • 0 0 • view
Here's another one for you, also by Butler, but I'm not thoroughly convinced you're capable of consuming academic literature so the first link may be better. www.amherst.edu/system/files...
sep 1, 2025, 10:05 pm • 0 0 • view
www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle...
sep 1, 2025, 10:01 pm • 0 0 • view
Judith Butler is a self hating misogynistic cunt.
sep 1, 2025, 10:07 pm • 2 0 • view
They have their anti-trans identity wrapped up in their hero. It's really that simple. They will ignore all facts and logic in the name of following "facts and logic."
sep 1, 2025, 9:40 pm • 0 0 • view
tfw facts and logic disagree with the "facts and logic" religion of Dawkins
sep 1, 2025, 9:52 pm • 0 0 • view
You'd think that Fox News liking him all of a sudden (and him identifying as Christian) would have been a red enough flag. This article isn't even ABOUT trans people, but then it just randomly ends with some random trans quote. Kinda like how our fool here randomly brings up being atheist.
sep 1, 2025, 10:00 pm • 0 0 • view
It astounds me every day that people who claim to be atheists somehow managed to organize a religion around atheism. As someone who actually *is* atheist, it's very disappointing to see.
sep 1, 2025, 10:03 pm • 0 0 • view