I just looked through the brief. His arguments re: deference are persuasive, but to what extent does that carry over to a Court's remedy powers? In other words, if the executive does do something unlawful, are there limits on the remedies? Is less deference owed in that regard as well?
It's a good question and one I haven't stared at. I don't know how the cause of action works; I just know that nothing in the separation of powers should interfere with whatever the cause of action is.
More to the point: If Executive Branch refuses to request that Bukele release Garcia what's the Art. III remedy?
