Why doesn't the ruling have circuit-wide effect? Or is it simply that the govt can attempt a deportation in another area of the circuit, but this case would be applicable binding precedent so not worth the litigation effort?
Why doesn't the ruling have circuit-wide effect? Or is it simply that the govt can attempt a deportation in another area of the circuit, but this case would be applicable binding precedent so not worth the litigation effort?
There are also district-wide injunctions already in place in the Southern and Western Districts of Texas: www.stevevladeck.com/p/150-the-st...
But hypothetically if there weren't?
Well then, sure. :-)