If scientists are loving Bluesky, but Glenn Greenwald and Matt Yglesias hate it, I know I’m in the right spot.
Replies
IMO BlueSky still has a lot of problems, pages often freeze and cannot move forward, the program needs to be updated more often.
sep 2, 2025, 9:56 pm • 0 0 • view
Skill issue.
sep 3, 2025, 3:55 am • 0 0 • view
Yep.
sep 2, 2025, 9:42 pm • 0 0 • view
Matt Yglesias doesn't hate Bluesky he posts here all the time.
sep 3, 2025, 8:30 am • 0 0 • view
There’s simply not enough preteen boys on Bluesky for Glenn’s liking* *allegedly
sep 3, 2025, 1:47 am • 0 0 • view
Bluesky reminds me of Mamdani—the identity of the haters makes a pretty strong endorsement.
sep 2, 2025, 10:06 pm • 4 0 • view
there's a @nytpitchbot.bsky.social headline in there somewhere
sep 2, 2025, 9:43 pm • 0 0 • view
Yeah Bsky seems bad for people who only care about reach, but ideal for people who want information or opinions.
sep 2, 2025, 10:23 pm • 2 0 • view
Yep
sep 3, 2025, 2:10 am • 1 0 • view
Matt Taibbi's not a big fan either. More bonus points.
sep 3, 2025, 1:12 am • 5 0 • view
But on xitter there are MOAR LIKES and REASOND DBATES OF BOTH SIDES. Not smug echo chamber of bias /s
sep 2, 2025, 9:46 pm • 1 0 • view
AND GROK
sep 2, 2025, 9:57 pm • 1 0 • view
Don't forget "missed again" Nate. He hates it here too.
sep 3, 2025, 1:12 am • 5 0 • view
Evidence based assertions get positive engagement while throwing out random contrarian engagement bait under the guise of "being clever" gets push back. Yes, I can see why the pundit caste is not happy with Bluesky.
sep 2, 2025, 10:23 pm • 6 0 • view