avatar
terg.bsky.social @terg.bsky.social

I don't get what that means.

aug 21, 2025, 10:00 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Heidi @imtooflexy.bsky.social

She was only allowed to shoot a dog that chased livestock *while* it was chasing livestock... while the rancher's livelihood was in danger.

aug 21, 2025, 10:11 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
terg.bsky.social @terg.bsky.social

That would be a justifiable law. In CO and a lot of states, you can shoot them for coming on your property in areas where you can use a gun. I thought the NPR report I heard this from said it was legal. But I'm not sure of that.

aug 21, 2025, 10:18 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Heidi @imtooflexy.bsky.social

Most states want hot pursuit, because they want you to rehome a livestock killer. Though I've *never* heard of a car being prosecuted, I've also never heard of anyone else who shot a dog for chasing chickens, especially with none dead. And I've been in livestock or livestock-adjacent all my life.

aug 21, 2025, 10:22 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Heidi @imtooflexy.bsky.social

A car? With? I've never heard of *anyone* being prosecuted.

aug 21, 2025, 10:24 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Heidi @imtooflexy.bsky.social

I looked up her state when it hit the news, though, and it was *not* a righteous kill.

aug 21, 2025, 10:23 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
terg.bsky.social @terg.bsky.social

Definitely not. The hunters in the story said they used vets for their dogs. They didn't discuss wayward dogs. Likely because they knew how to train them.

aug 21, 2025, 10:35 pm • 1 0 • view