avatar
CyeSterling @cyesterling.bsky.social

This is a really good read. It barely scrapes the surface and there is a lot of info. It is true that recounts are still moving through the system for approval. I've been tracking this awhile and I'll say that Google has done a great job scrubbing a lot of info. smartelections.us/2024-electio...

jun 26, 2025, 7:15 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
PinkTweets @pinktweets.bsky.social

Did you know that Diane Sare dropped her case? www.morningstar.com/news/accessw...

jun 26, 2025, 7:35 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
PinkTweets @pinktweets.bsky.social

No one has scrubbed anything. This stuff is readily available. And you should now delete your erroneous post about statewide hand recounts. Don’t become a blue anon conspiracy monger spreading misinformation.

jun 26, 2025, 7:24 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
PinkTweets @pinktweets.bsky.social

I read it last week. It is misleading. The judge made no finding that there was enough evidence to go forward. I read the actual court documents. It was a standard scheduling order. There was no question of sufficiency of evidence, i.e. there was no motion to dismiss. They are counting on

jun 26, 2025, 7:21 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
PinkTweets @pinktweets.bsky.social

People not understanding court procedures and not reading the actual court documents.

jun 26, 2025, 7:21 pm • 0 0 • view