avatar
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έπ•€π•Ÿπ••π•ͺ β„π•–π•—π•¦π•˜π•–π•–πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ @indyrefugee.bsky.social

If Tulsi Gabbard were half the β€œanti-war” proponent she made herself look to be, she would be publicly and truthfully assessing Iran’s nuclear capabilities on every available media outlet until the bastard is forced to fire her.

jun 21, 2025, 1:35 am β€’ 92 25

Replies

avatar
hippythug.bsky.social @hippythug.bsky.social

Thinking she would do the right thing in any situation is not in the cards.

jun 21, 2025, 1:36 am β€’ 1 0 β€’ view
avatar
NurseGenius @nursegenius1019.bsky.social

She is already back peddling

jun 21, 2025, 1:38 am β€’ 1 0 β€’ view
avatar
darthstar.bsky.social @darthstar.bsky.social

Reporters just need to ask her why she's not being honest with the American people and if she's afraid Trump will fire her if she is. Assume she's lying. Fuck her feelings when asking that question. She works for us, not Trump.

jun 21, 2025, 3:35 pm β€’ 0 0 β€’ view
avatar
mescalerodevildog.bsky.social @mescalerodevildog.bsky.social

Tulsi is not an ant-war proponent, she is a Kremlin apologist. During her hearing when she said Iran was not developing nuclear weapons, she is trying to stop Israel and the US from attacking Iran which might shame Putin who signed a defense pact with them and cannot come to their aid when attacked.

jun 21, 2025, 1:46 am β€’ 3 0 β€’ view
avatar
larjmarj.bsky.social @larjmarj.bsky.social

In truth, if this is her actual feeling about things, she might be better behind the scenes

jun 21, 2025, 1:36 am β€’ 1 0 β€’ view
avatar
skateintraffic @skateintraffic.bsky.social

At best her position can be described as anti- dead US soldiers. But the proximity to power is more important than the campaign platforms ofc

jun 21, 2025, 1:45 am β€’ 0 0 β€’ view
avatar
Gxro6883 @gxro6883.bsky.social

Agree, sadly I’m fairly sure there are plenty of bloodthirsty sycophants ready to take her place.

jun 21, 2025, 8:08 am β€’ 1 0 β€’ view