He didnβt say any of that. He didnβt say she lost because of her campaign. He said there are too many Americans who donβt believe in this current reiteration of democracy.
Replies
Read what I was replying to, it included more than the "democracy" topic. That's what I was addressing.
aug 4, 2025, 12:07 pm β’ 1 0 β’ view
Then Iβm not sure why youβre liking all the post saying exactly the opposite of what I said.
aug 4, 2025, 7:40 pm β’ 0 0 β’ view
1. Again, was explaining what my post was about. 2. I have no idea what posts you believe are "exactly the opposite" of what you said that I supposedly "liked". Seriously haven't pd attention to who the comments, that are popping up on my notifications, are replying to. When I agree - I "like".
aug 4, 2025, 9:12 pm β’ 0 0 β’ view
Those they chose the option that is even more corrupt and far, far more beholden to a handful of oligarchs? You think that makes any sense at all?
aug 4, 2025, 4:34 am β’ 20 0 β’ view
No, it doesn't. IMO, the MAGA base was locked in. What tipped the scales was the MSM and its relentless focus on inflation, added to other controversies they pushed... immigration, Gaza, Biden's mental acuity and alleged coverup. Ignorant voters: "things were better under Trump."
aug 4, 2025, 2:34 pm β’ 10 0 β’ view
Exactly. The Democrats need to do something they seem absolutely loathe to do: call out the mainstream media for their pro-Republican lean. They are not your friend; in fact that have been as insidiously opposed to your party as the Republicans have been overtly so.
aug 4, 2025, 3:12 pm β’ 7 0 β’ view
Absolutely spot on! Iβve been saying this for ages.
aug 5, 2025, 5:22 pm β’ 1 0 β’ view
Iβm not a fan of blaming Democrat βmessagingβ for their political failures; the Establishment writ large is largely arrayed against them. That said, I think this is one way to fight back effectively, and I think it would be very effective - lots of opportunities to go viral in the new ecosystem.
aug 5, 2025, 5:38 pm β’ 0 0 β’ view
Definitely!
aug 5, 2025, 6:05 pm β’ 1 0 β’ view
Your semi-literate interlocutor has 87k followers.
aug 4, 2025, 5:07 am β’ 1 0 β’ view
87k followers doesn't mean he's automatically right. The Fox News prime time lineup has upwards of 2 million viewers every night, and look how much BS they spew out into the world...
aug 4, 2025, 2:30 pm β’ 3 0 β’ view
Heβs barely coherent, difficult to tell if heβs βrightβ about anything. π
aug 4, 2025, 2:53 pm β’ 1 0 β’ view
In fact, it might be a klout pharming bot, rather than a real person. π€
aug 4, 2025, 2:56 pm β’ 1 0 β’ view
Actually, he did blame her campaign, citing her defense of democracy. What he describes as the correct version of democracy to run on are the very things she ran on.
aug 4, 2025, 2:57 pm β’ 2 0 β’ view
Actually, he didnβt blame her campaign. Youβre an anarchist who doesnβt understand nuance or words.
aug 4, 2025, 7:39 pm β’ 0 0 β’ view
"I don't have a LOT of critiques of Kamala Harris's campaign... BUT she ran a campaign asking people to stand up and defend democracy... " Then he goes on to say "we need to stand for a version of democracy that's clean and not corrupt." Harris never defended corruption - just the opposite.
aug 4, 2025, 11:29 pm β’ 1 0 β’ view
He said she ran on defending the version of democracy (normal) in place under Biden. So they voted for Trump because they wanted his "version" (fascism) instead? Nah.
aug 4, 2025, 2:17 pm β’ 2 0 β’ view
He was making a point. And she didnβt ever campaign on fixing the system. I wonβt let anarchists tear down another good man.
aug 4, 2025, 7:39 pm β’ 0 0 β’ view
I am in no way an anarchist. I like Chris Murphy, especially his work trying to rein in guns after Sandy Hook. Certainly not tearing him down. I claim his critique is without merit. What does he intend to do that she didn't address? What "fixing" of the system is he going to do that she wasn't?
aug 4, 2025, 11:20 pm β’ 2 0 β’ view