Don’t think the girls/women could be expected to know. Maybe some did. The defendants can’t be compelled to testify (5th). In court I don’t think the “client” would be necessary and may open up opportunities to the defense for acquittal. But let’s be honest, Тяцмр is a dirty ass pervert. 🤮
But the prosecution couldn't make the charges stick and couldn't get a conviction without a customer. The prosecution must know who they are. The only person I have heard accused is Prince Andrew, but that didn't happen in the U.S., so I don't think they could face U.S. charges for it.
Haven’t read the transcript/not a lawyer. A handful of women - then girls - swear under oath to the facts. They say “strange men”. Andrew is in pics so there’s one… Gislaine (?) pleads 5th but she’s in pics too. Does a jury need to know every sick fuck who abused them to convict? I wouldn’t.
Okay. The prosecutor hears girls say "strange men". Are they not interested in who these strange men are so they can prosecute them as well? Surely they made some effort to discover their identities. They could ask them to look through a photo book. Were ALL of those efforts fruitless?
Guessing that’s a different trial. One key witness recently killed herself. Did she name everyone she could? Evidence? Hanging about vs involved in illegality (rape)? I really don’t know. Тяцмр is all over the record and we see how much that matters.