First, have they declared only Palestinians or Muslims will be accepted? I don’t think so. Second, the area where Israel sits was a Jewish state 2000 years ago. Should people have claim to land their ancestor occupied thousands of years ago? Because that would turn interesting.

They have declared that the entire time, yes, and have been extremely explicit about it. Their dipshit supporters in the West ignore this, just as they project secularism onto practicing Muslims in spite of how loudly Muslim these people are.

Isn't that also the operating premise of Landback? What's the difference between returning land to Indigenous Americans and restoring the Jewish state in the Levant, exactly?

That Landback will never happen unless symbolic transfers of a few acres count. Also, the 2003 draft Palestinian constitution allows Jewish people to live in such a state…not Israelis, but Jews. Let’s see how it goes when Assyrians try to carve territory in Syria, Iran, and all the lands of Babylon

Oh…how about when the Greeks get the UN to return big chunks of Turkey including Constantinople! Or the Italians try to get France and England back!

Blah blah blah, at the end of the day Israel has nuclear weapons, if that's Russia's 'get away with genocide for fun and profit' card, why are Jews different to Russians again?

That's kind of what's been happening in Kurdistan for decades and Arabs 'solve' it with the national sport of genocide and can't even do *that* right because they suck really badly at war but are addicted to starting them regardless. Maybe Arabs should learn to live with minorities, not kill them.