“We think this law creates challenges that go beyond its child safety goals, and creates significant barriers that limit free speech and disproportionately harm smaller platforms and emerging technologies,” the Bluesky team said in its statement.
“We think this law creates challenges that go beyond its child safety goals, and creates significant barriers that limit free speech and disproportionately harm smaller platforms and emerging technologies,” the Bluesky team said in its statement.
Also sounds like a setup for someone to profit and be able to use it against Bluesky for liability! Smart move Bluesky !
Yes indeed.
Whether or not these laws are actually effective at protecting children is unclear; the use of virtual private networks (VPNs) in the UK spiked just after its age-verification law went into effect as users deployed the tech to spoof their location.
Thank you Bluesky 👍🏽
They're not effective, never have been. The real way to keep kids safe is to educate the parents and pay them enough to not have to work so much that they have no time to be with kids.
I'm genuinely asking -- why wouldn't X and Instagram be harmed much more?
Cuz they have the money to afford the ridiculous demands of the law
this is all about suppressing the free exchange of information and speech
*this* meaning: Mississippi's age requirement tied to prohibitively excessive fines. If they cared at all about kids they would DEMAND the release of the Epstein Files.
“Protect children!” But they’re not all that interested in Trump as a pedofile-
if they wanted to protect children they'd stop arming israel
They wont be effective. If Id had asked my parents to use their ID to sign up for something, they totally would have - without understanding what it is. They trusted me & didnt care what I read.
Do Twitter and Truth social have age verification rules?
We can’t has mississippians learning nothin