avatar
ME/CFS Science @mecfsskeptic.bsky.social

5) The full declaration and list of signees can be viewed on the website of the German ME/CFS Research Foundation:

sep 2, 2025, 9:32 am • 13 0

Replies

avatar
ME/CFS research @cfsresearch.bsky.social

Why just call for biomedical research? It's interesting the Fluge's trial showed no benefit for the biomedical treatment being tested, yet resulted in 38% long term remission.

sep 2, 2025, 3:53 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Andreas Longva @andlon.bsky.social

The first trial on Rituximab was a small study using the Fukuda criteria, which are broader than what we consider ME today. The larger study didn't show such significant remission rates in the placebo group afaik, so it's hard to say what that first study means... A fluke?

sep 2, 2025, 5:10 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
ME/CFS research @cfsresearch.bsky.social

Response rate was 35.1% in the placebo controlled trial, which was similar to the open-label trial, and had a similar definition (> 4.5 fatigue score). Interestingly, though, the placebo trial showed no improvement in fatigue over the trial, so were 35% classed as responders at baseline? There was

sep 2, 2025, 5:48 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
ME/CFS research @cfsresearch.bsky.social

an improvement in fatigue in the open-label trial.

sep 2, 2025, 5:48 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Andreas Longva @andlon.bsky.social

Unfortunately I didn't have access to the full article for the 2019 one so I was only going by the abstract of that one. What you point out does sound strange..

sep 2, 2025, 5:53 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
ME/CFS research @cfsresearch.bsky.social

It's on scihub.

sep 2, 2025, 6:38 pm • 1 0 • view