avatar
Philip N Cohen @philipncohen.com

That's because they realized resistance to, e.g., tuberculosis wasn't necessarily correlated with other genetic advantages. So letting babies die of flu or whatever didn't necessarily improve the race/species. Basically they wanted to weed people out more rationally. /3

aug 30, 2025, 12:30 am • 68 4

Replies

avatar
Philip N Cohen @philipncohen.com

All bad, of course, but amazingly we have reached the point where we are ranking the eugenicists who run the government. And RFK's views - on this scale! - are very bad. Here's a review article on this: ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2... /4

aug 30, 2025, 12:30 am • 87 13 • view
avatar
giantsigh.bsky.social @giantsigh.bsky.social

So we are going back in time to the early 1900s.

aug 31, 2025, 12:35 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kathleen @irishkathaleenie.bsky.social

Eugenicists-That's my favorite Chapter in the Bible! RFK Jr. is such a good Christian!

aug 30, 2025, 3:56 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Alex @drspider666.bsky.social

Yes Dr Squires in 1893 said that letting tuberculosis run riot is the stupidest eugenics idea! Unless you want 1/3 of population chronically sick with TB (estimated in England 1835). The more I read, though, the more I sense eugenicists DROOLING at the idea of overseeing an orgy of human suffering.

aug 30, 2025, 12:44 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
No poop for you @nopoopforyou.bsky.social

Maybe they think all the suffering and death will give them UNLIMITED POWER! Sent straight to their katra through BALL TANNING MACHINES!

aug 30, 2025, 1:57 am • 1 0 • view