It’s a bit of a gray area, I’d say, as Thrawn as introduced to canon in the Disney area, though I’m well aware he came from novels. I think it counts as the new trilogy did away with a LOT of the book content that was pretty good.
It’s a bit of a gray area, I’d say, as Thrawn as introduced to canon in the Disney area, though I’m well aware he came from novels. I think it counts as the new trilogy did away with a LOT of the book content that was pretty good.
I also kinda love Rampart from the Bad Batch.
I think rampart is intresting because he is like the first burocrat we see as a villain right? Yes it saies admiral but he is bassicly a burocrat
Many are. I think most of the interesting villains in the Disney era have some gray area to them, redemption arcs, & so on.
I would say it isnt because its bassicly the same character (fans would have rioted if they changed him and filonie unsterstood that luckily) same goes for pellaeon this are bassicly the same characters from heir to the empire
Right, but he wasn’t canon until he appeared in Rebels. I think Filoni has been good about bringing novel characters into the canon as well as developing some pretty good original characters.
Because the question of canon was irrelevant before disney the books were canon to us fans and to the authors who keept it consistent Noone even considered that heir to the empire wasnt the natural continuation of episode 6 it just was
Yeah, but it was a matter of opinion, more than any stated fact. It’s a shame that the didn’t do Heir to the Empire as episode 7.
On one hand i think the story of zahns trilogy is much better than what we got yes on the other hand i think it would have had to focuse on Like jaina jacen and like zekk because the og actors were to old