Amar may be the most overrated living legal scholar who is not actively insane.
Amar may be the most overrated living legal scholar who is not actively insane.
May be?
If you’ve done a systematic survey of living legal scholars that permits you to render a judgment without qualification, I’ll happily defer to your findings. I have not, so I’m working on vibes.
You mistake me - there's no "may be" about it - you're spot on
(Removing the caveat, it’s surely Vermeule, but then there’s a whole bunch of competition.)
i mean, the caveat may be assuming facts not in evidence