I actually really like your columns and I don’t expect you to criticize the paper, but I disagree that it doesn’t pick and choose angles that align with partisan agendas.
I actually really like your columns and I don’t expect you to criticize the paper, but I disagree that it doesn’t pick and choose angles that align with partisan agendas.
How do you know that? Are you in editorial meetings? Because I am party to that process and frankly you give it too much credit for coordination, consistency and agenda.
You are actually defending the editorial staff who platformed a neo-Nazi and hid who he was. I don’t know how you can possibly frame this in any way that makes sense.
Of course I’m not, though I suspect it’d be fascinating to watch. Acknowledging my own biases, I’m hardly alone in seeing the product this way. I’ll take your word for it that there isn’t a grand strategy of coordination, but it sure seems like it from the outside sometimes.