Is this a solution or do we still need to address the lack of naturally produced foods in the wild for bees? I don't see this being addressed in online articles.
Is this a solution or do we still need to address the lack of naturally produced foods in the wild for bees? I don't see this being addressed in online articles.
It is a stop gap to buy us time to figure out a better long term solution. So it is a good thing, a very good thing, but it doesn't mean the situation is *solved* just temporarily mitigated.
I'm beginning to think the solution is only less humans.
Humans are part of the world, we are as natural as anything else. Get rid of the profit motive and most problems caused by "humans" go away.
Rabbits are also natural. As are rats. Look what those natural beings did when they were exported around the world. There are times and places for natural things, including humans. We were fine when we were 20M in N & S America... 100M worldwide.
Steven Miller would agree with you on the overpopulation
Probably not. He wants race based elimination, while I want major diversity and also understand that science and technology are driven by population size.
Race based elimination is the face of it, sure. But when Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, VA care goes away after the midterms - it’s gonna be the poor who die regardless of race. So - you want to reduce the population - who goes and who stays?
Self selection. Miller wants extermination camps. I want expanded education. The result in both cases is less humans. But the methods and results are so incredibly different that it defies logic to compare them. The only metric that matches is the raw number of humans. NOTHING else matches.
Expanded education is the way.
Absolutely!
Zero doubt. There is no other way.
Humans are migratory, that is part of human nature. We travel. There with out the profit motive f*ing things up we would be fine. Anyway our population is starting to naturally decline (the growth has slowed and will stop and reverse, on its own). I am more worried about Climate Change.
Language comparing humans to undesired pests, vermin, rodents, etc. is often weaponized to dehumanize people preceding acts of genocide.
True. Thank the gods I don't do that. Or support it.
You think so, but you ARE focusing directly on the population reduction route. Who gets to decide who gets to procreate? Or migrate? Or get life-saving care? This way lies eugenics. These are the underpinnings of eugenics and genocides. Don't step onto this path. Choose a different approach.
Education, education, education. The more people are educated, the lower the birth rate without putting in any other measures. But! The number of people isn't really the problem! We have enough, produce enough, for *everyone* already here to live nice lives if the profit motive wasn't a factor.
I say let individuals make informed decisions for themselves. Or is that a nazi method in your opinion?
You know who gets to decide the “times and places for natural things” Jon? Nature. Not Jon.
You know it's only natural that humans wiped out the Carolina Parakeet, the North American Bison, the Dodo, Tasmanian Wolf, and the gods only know how many others. We fish the oceans dry. We burn the Amazon. It's 'natural' because humans are natural. Right?
Wow. You posted I don't get to decide, what, 3 hours after I said I don't get to decide? I bet you thought you were being clever, don't you?
Humans are neither rabbits nor any kind of vermin you can come up with. We are not going to let this discussion go down the ecofascism path. Nuh-uh.
No, they are not. That you made that connection in YOUR head says more about you, than it does about me, who never thought that.
🔪🔪🔪 #Dexter
the latter imho
Probably yes. I think the answer to that is a complex ecological question requiring balance with other concerns like food supply and water usage. It is very good thing to be able to sustain a minimum viable bee population and recover from die off quicker.