Why withhold recognition if Isreal accepts two states? Unless the UK gov wants withholding recognition to be a reward for Isreal to get the Israelis to pay lip service to two states but not have to actually mean it?
Why withhold recognition if Isreal accepts two states? Unless the UK gov wants withholding recognition to be a reward for Isreal to get the Israelis to pay lip service to two states but not have to actually mean it?
It's a good tactic to encourage Israeli policy change. Hopefully other European countries do the same. It's worth a go, even if ultimately futile. And Starmer's statement made it pretty clear that 'lip service' to a two-state solution wouldn't cut it.
Sorry, I still don’t get it. Why not recognise Palestine anyway?
Because simply recognising a Palestinian state won't produce a Palestinian state. Circumstances must actually change on the ground for it to happen. And the best way that occurs is for Israel to recommit to a two-state solution. So it's worth using it as leverage to attempt the optimal outcome.
Ok, thanks. I hope you are right. I worry it’s about words and not deeds. If Isreal were to genuinely accept two states they’ll be recognising Palestine themselves as part of that.
Fortunately, I strongly suspect the UK and other countries won't consider some ambiguous and performative Israeli govt statement about wanting peace with Palestinians to be anywhere near satisfactory.