I agree. Most of us couldn't write after four years and 40 exams. That has to be taught, too. Then it needs to be tested in a way immune to ChatGPT. There is a basic distinction between using new technology to help one learn (good) vs. using it to avoid learning (bad). How you test it is crucial.
I agree. But more important than the evaluation is the learning you get by *doing*.
With current assays and take-home exam format, the primary application of ChatGPT is to avoid the *doing*. And I disagree that evaluation is less important. We owe it to the best students to recognise them as such.