Where do you see that in the article? I see the article questioning both the idea of verificationism and the wholesale rejection of metaphysics.
Where do you see that in the article? I see the article questioning both the idea of verificationism and the wholesale rejection of metaphysics.
My bad, on closer read, it's a logical positivism post-mortem after Gödel's incompleteness theorems. Russell wrote, "With what logical positivism has to say about empirical knowledge, I find myself, on some important points, no longer in agreement with most members of the school." (p. 1210)