Being rude, hell bent and narrow minded is not a mental illness, sorry to inform. ALL types of people can suffer from mental illness, including trans.
Replies
So you're saying all trans people are not mentally ill so being trans is not a mental illness?
aug 27, 2025, 9:19 pm • 0 0 • view
They also seem to be implying that trans people are rude, hellbent, and narrow minded. But to be fair we're probably the only trans people they've ever talked to.
aug 27, 2025, 9:21 pm • 1 0 • view
I'm not trans, actually, I'm just a good person who's not afraid to say what he believes. Unlike some Nazis here.
aug 27, 2025, 9:22 pm • 1 0 • view
Oh good to know! Sorry for the assumption, I am so used to the only people who actively stand up for trans people being other trans people. Anyways, thanks for your fierce and unflinching allyship.
aug 27, 2025, 9:23 pm • 1 0 • view
No worries! No reason for me to take it personally. I'm not a fan of these assholes
aug 27, 2025, 9:25 pm • 1 0 • view
Wow, nice fake twist on my words. ASSumptions are wild. Not even going to dignify that with a reality check.
aug 27, 2025, 9:23 pm • 0 0 • view
Dude you've said so many fucking words that aren't "yes" or "no" followed by your thoughts on whether or not all trans people are mentally ill. Seriously, this is embarrassing. It's pathetic. You're absolutely failing to present this argument in a way that anyone will find compelling. You look weak.
aug 27, 2025, 9:26 pm • 1 0 • view
I ignore that direct question for a reason, because it's loaded "dude". By even asking that question you bring to surface a fckd up narrative. It's dehumanizing to target one group of people for a complex topic as a talking point. Asking that is simple adding fuel to the fire.
aug 27, 2025, 9:39 pm • 0 0 • view
What the hell do you think a "loaded question" is? It's not that. You either believe trans people are mentally ill, or you don't. Yes or no. This is just a humiliation ritual now.
aug 27, 2025, 9:45 pm • 1 0 • view
A fucked up narrative that you were implying in your posts with your "research" that you used 4 AI's to do, that used X as a source that you trusted and then later made the argument that x isn't owned by a nazi.
aug 27, 2025, 9:46 pm • 1 0 • view
It was a quick screen grab based on a question of "how do you know they were trans". If you needed a full dissertation 20 minutes after the news hit from someone to put out the fact that this person is fkn nutso and happens to identify as trans, well get off social media to find it.
aug 27, 2025, 9:55 pm • 0 0 • view
It's also fucking wrong. The ai said they're female to male. IF they are trans, they're a trans woman, meaning they were born male. If you knew anything about this, youd know that.
aug 27, 2025, 10:02 pm • 1 0 • view
You could have written one sentence or an essay the rival the length of the most robust works of the English language. You would still be spreading dangerous misinformation about trans people, mental illness, and the motivations of the shooter, because ai fed you some nazi propaganda and you guzzled
aug 27, 2025, 10:03 pm • 1 0 • view
Putting out a fact reported by many at the time is not misinformation. AI is simply a strong search engine to find some sources to review. It wasn't propaganda, ignoring it is obfuscating the facts.
aug 27, 2025, 10:16 pm • 0 0 • view
Was this person a "female-to-male" trans person?
aug 27, 2025, 10:19 pm • 1 0 • view
Ai regularly miscredits or hallucinates sources and gives obvious misinformation, even still, the information you shared that was given to you by ai was claimed to have come from x, the nazi website owned by a nazi, and you were dumb enough to call that research.
aug 27, 2025, 10:30 pm • 0 0 • view
I'm not the one claiming to be a life saving researcher/counselor or whatever, so I will happily rudely and narrow mindedly hellbently dunk on you by twisting your words against you, a thing you've also done in this conversation that's not an argument somehow.
aug 27, 2025, 9:28 pm • 1 0 • view