People who don't understand how this was written always focus on "in whole or in part" because they don't understand it has to be with *intent*, otherwise every nation that's ever gone to war is presumptively guilty of genocide.
Replies
Here is the copy and paste. I'm not an attorney, just an HR person so IMO, I'm not qualified but "intent", as Tom has noted, is the key word.
aug 31, 2025, 11:30 pm • 0 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/stud...
aug 31, 2025, 11:29 pm • 0 0 • view
They’ve stated their intent is to wipe out Gaza. And they’re like 40% of the way through the job. I hear what you’re arguing, I’m just sure why you ignore that part.
aug 31, 2025, 10:27 pm • 0 0 • view
Mens Rea en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocid...
aug 31, 2025, 11:22 pm • 0 0 • view
What part is *not* covered by Israel’s actions?
aug 31, 2025, 11:24 pm • 0 0 • view
Stu, it’s a legal standard that requires very specific evidence of what someone was *thinking* (what was their intent) when they performed an action - e.g. was it their specific intent to bomb a hospital in order to cause the death of innocent civilians? Or was the intent something less than that?
aug 31, 2025, 11:48 pm • 0 0 • view
www.populismstudies.org/professor-sc...
sep 1, 2025, 2:52 pm • 0 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/stud...
sep 1, 2025, 3:35 am • 0 0 • view
Are they intentionally starving the Palestinians by blocking food assistance?
sep 1, 2025, 12:26 am • 1 0 • view