Who, in this scenario, is going backwards? The group of people who want to be allowed to live, or those in power opposed to allowing them to live?
Who, in this scenario, is going backwards? The group of people who want to be allowed to live, or those in power opposed to allowing them to live?
Those refusing to vote Dem are getting exactly what I thought. The GOP constantly attacks all minorities. Don't vote Dem and that's what happens.
DEMS ARE NOT STOPPING ANY OF THOSE ATTACKS FFS
Weird how the party not in power doesn't have the numbers to stop the part in power... If that seems odd to you, go back and watch Schoolhouse Rock again.
Nope. You helped to vote them out of power. Well done.
I voted for them, dipshit. Every fucking time. And where we are now is what that’s gotten us. You better have a better fucking plan if you’re gonna keep mouthing off with this bullshit.
He's completely invented someone in his head to argue with. Fork found in kitchen
Hey, do you think Democrats who agree with the GOP about minorities are going to oppose them?
Are Newsom or Buttigieg currently running for president or other higher office? Have either announced any intent to do so?
No. Neither has. And Newsom is way too busy fighting for California to even consider throwing out there.
You make less sense every comment
What is not making sense? You talk about voting for Dems, but are either of these guys currently seeking office? How would I vote for them if they're not?
All I said was that Dems do not actively attack the rights of minorities. You done power-loading your diapers now?
There was a president only a few months ago who signed the first anti LGBT bill in decades. Wanna take one guess on what political party he belonged to, and then revise your claim?
Go back and watch Schoolhouse Rock again. It was a great bill that Johnson tainted at the very end, and which could have been easily fixed if people like you didn't help the GOP stay in control of the House. It's like you don't know how any of this works.
Hey man I'm just asking questions. I don't agree that the lack of an attack is worthy of support. A vigorous defense, however, would be.
You're helping the people who want you put in concentration camps. Bold strategy. How's that working out for you?
blaming trans people for own oppression, liberal classic
If that's what they're voting for, then yeah. Salem is a very trans-friendly city and I and friends with or aquatinted with dozens. None of whom voted against their own interests.
If they voted Harris they did.
The problem being that the people you demand we vote for are doing nothing to prevent that.
Newsom is hanging out with those people and saying they have great points. Buttigeig is on the record explicitly saying that their concerns are reasonable and need to be taken seriously. We want people like that not to be in the "opposition" party in any position with power. Is that too much to ask?
Why are you fantasizing about right wingers harming me? Have I been anything but polite with you? This is not a normal way to talk with people who disagree with you and not a good way to bring people to your side.
You're the one allowing Nazis to control your life. I voted for Harris, who would have just left you alone. You have zero ability to argue in good faith. Nobody is "fantasizing" about right wingers harming you. That's just an idiotic fucking take.
Why would anyone argue in good faith with a social fascist, like yourself, who is still proud they voted for continued genocide and policies that were already hurting marginalized communities? If you want to become an ally, move left.
Dude you're bringing up "the camps" to a queer person who is politely disagreeing with you and you think I'M the one talking in bad faith???
Then vote to make sure you get the full-blown attack. "Every candidate has to agree with everything I do or I'm not voting for them." Grow the fuck up. This is why what's happening now is happening, instead of that fuckface Watters just bitching into the void.
Why do you think it so unreasonable to withhold my support for a person who will not defend my safety?
Because you unwittingly support those who will aggressively attack you.
Because he wants trump to win. He wants the Democrats to use a known-losing strategy free of pressure to correct. Therefore he wants trump to win
Do you often find yourself having to obfuscate the arguments vulnerable minorities are making about the threats to their rights and lives?
You mean clarify. Learn the meaning of words before you use them.
You’re still going? Haven’t you embarrassed yourself enough yet?