If they have no reason to come out, it follows that they are supportive of the far right dictatorahip that's trying to entrench itself in this country for good. Sorry that you get asked to hold your nose to literally save people's lives. Must be unbearable
do you want to win? or do you just want to feel superior to these voters? it really seems like the latter. im not even saying those voters are justified. im saying either you get their votes or you lose. and votescolding doesnt get their votes, so what is your plan?
The narrative of sitting the election out because Harris didn't tick all of the idealized checkmarks was passed down to you by tech broligarchs via influencing ops solely for the purpose of them getting their way in 2024. You guys still running with it like idiots as if it ever were honest argument
nope, i decided all on my own that i wont vote for a candidate who continues arming Israel after theyve slaughtered tens of thousands of innocents. if you needed my vote, you should have been protesting the genocide harder, and Harris should have listened to the protests. not my problem
Every presidential candidate in the US will continue arming Israel. This is not a point of differentiation. What is, though, is that Netanyahu clearly thought a Trump cabinet will let him get away with more. And you did your little part to help him.
"we simply HAVE to vote for genocide" yeah i dont think im going to listen to you, about anything
At the time it was "high risk of genocide" technically. Now, with your help, it's a full on genocide – carried out not via flashy bombings tob catch your attention, but via much more economical starvation. Congrats. Youb can pay yourself on the back.
There was a genocide going on during the Biden administration, and the starvation was happening then too. Nice try.
"At the time it was "high risk of genocide" technically." lmao listen to yourself
Again, curious that you find humor in what you yourself call a genocide. Almost as if you don't actually care about it beyond a talking point. I just go by the ICJ ruling. But by now things have turned different – starving out a city is very definitely a genocidal tactic.
im not "finding humor", im aghast. "it was technically only high risk of genocide" is really a chilling, psychotic thing to say
You're not aghast. When you had the chance to at least try to not make those people's situation worse, you decided to help out your friend Netanyahu instead – and congratulate yourself to this day over it, instead of tearing own hair out in horror over the mistake.