avatar
Robert Evans (the Only Robert Evans) @iwriteok.bsky.social

excited to hear more people explain to me that this is how rockets are supposed to work

jun 19, 2025, 4:30 am • 2,896 203

Replies

avatar
Coherent Light @coherentlight.bsky.social

Something is obviously broken with the process here. Nobody would ever fly on this thing. It's a shit show.

jun 19, 2025, 9:58 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Misadventures In Astro @misadventures.astronomer.social

Watching the Elonati inhaling copium and trying to PR spin the disaster known as Starshit in real time is both comforting and depressing. How much longer before someone gets killed by SpaceX because corners were cut, regulations were too "burdensome", or people inside were afraid to call Elon out.

jun 19, 2025, 5:32 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Andrew Herring @andrewherring.bsky.social

I'd quote the lyric "I make the rockets go up, I don't care where they come down, that's not my department, says Werner von Braun" but Elon Musk can't even build rockets well enough to make it that far into the song.

jun 19, 2025, 4:44 am • 7 0 • view
avatar
Dissident Love @dissidentlove.bsky.social

Yo @grok is this real?

jun 19, 2025, 2:21 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Sutrskoc @sutrskoc.bsky.social

I have a feeling that they change some fundamental feature with every iteration, because they cant hit their performance targets, so everytime they actually go out and test its basically a new rocket and all that previous test data is useless.

jun 19, 2025, 6:06 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
odinthavok.bsky.social @odinthavok.bsky.social

I often confuse rockets and missiles, too

jun 19, 2025, 10:54 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Mark F @markfford.bsky.social

Would never happen to a rocket which had embraced the Saviour Lord Jesus Christ.

jun 19, 2025, 9:54 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
tusslepuppy.bsky.social @tusslepuppy.bsky.social

spacex’s track record has been spotty but, as the Beasties would say, this one smells like sabotage

jun 20, 2025, 1:28 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Greg Fournier @gregpf4.bsky.social

SpaceX is going to be buried by Honda... the tech startup model is not conductive to developing complex engineering systems that MUST work safely and reliably.

jun 19, 2025, 12:44 pm • 9 1 • view
avatar
Rob L @robll.bsky.social

I think it's a very visible metaphor for very rich people and corporations being able to treat the world like a toilet after a roadside burrito with little to no blowback.

jun 19, 2025, 4:36 am • 16 0 • view
avatar
Arroz con Halib @arrozconhalib.bsky.social

New I-69 billboard just dropped: [photo of the explosion] “RENOVATED: Bidets at Buc-ees!”

jun 19, 2025, 6:02 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Miley @miley-not-cyrus.bsky.social

jun 19, 2025, 4:34 am • 7 0 • view
avatar
Along Comes Bort @harriet-tubgirl.bsky.social

Well rockets are supposed to explode, only the explosion is supposed to go out one end instead of all directions at once

jun 19, 2025, 1:16 pm • 26 2 • view
avatar
The Tabby Report @tabbyreport.bsky.social

Maybe it was a test run of the bomb from Dark Star?

jun 19, 2025, 4:33 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Sam Pottle @dribrats.bsky.social

Teach it phenomenology.

jun 19, 2025, 4:50 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Random QA Guy @vought.bsky.social

I bet Eric Berger is sad.

jun 19, 2025, 4:38 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
compliancedivision.bsky.social @compliancedivision.bsky.social

Waste, fraud, and abuse

jun 19, 2025, 4:36 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Allan @cnalla.bsky.social

It was all going extremely well until it blew up.

jun 19, 2025, 7:11 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Cowb0t 𓅃 @cowb0t.bsky.social

There was fire and parts of it went into space, what more can you ask for!

jun 19, 2025, 5:48 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Davin, Prime directive adherent @mosphotos.bsky.social

Better drug test him again

jun 19, 2025, 5:45 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Igor cat @igor-kitty.bsky.social

Can we get crypto or AI to fix this? Seems like we should try.

jun 19, 2025, 2:09 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Notorius RPT @thenotoriusrpt.bsky.social

It's not like rocket science is rocket science...

jun 19, 2025, 4:44 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
whensmthcries.bsky.social @whensmthcries.bsky.social

I am so sick of that stupid phrase at this point. "Move fast and break things" is an absolutely idiotic ethos and people just parroting it every time a tech moron fucks things up is absolutely maddening.

jun 19, 2025, 6:11 pm • 9 1 • view
avatar
Alex Staniforth @alexstaniforth.bsky.social

Well that’s OK because “move fast and break things” has evolved into “don’t go anywhere and explode.”

jun 19, 2025, 7:00 pm • 4 1 • view
avatar
whensmthcries.bsky.social @whensmthcries.bsky.social

Even from its outset it was idiotic because what it's essentially saying is "gloss over the foundational work in the name of chasing the appearance of innovation". Which is dumb because it gets bored of the actually important part, meaning any "innovation" it does will be shallow and unstable

jun 19, 2025, 7:07 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Dave @dept-of-dave.bsky.social

Some dork: “No, you don’t get it: they’ve never had a reusable rocket before!” Me:

Screenshot of Wikipedia entry for “Solid Rocket Booster,” a component of the Space Shuttle used by NASA in the late 20th Century. A portion of text is highlighted that reads: “designed for recovery and reuse.”
jun 19, 2025, 5:04 am • 28 2 • view
avatar
Sutrskoc @sutrskoc.bsky.social

Right, but fishing it out the water and having the factory clean and rebuild it is not the same thing as they have been trying (and failing) to do ?

jun 19, 2025, 6:03 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dave @dept-of-dave.bsky.social

Correct, but the dorks should be more precise in how they write about these things.

jun 19, 2025, 12:18 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Dermo @deadlocked.org

“SpaceX were the first to build a space craft that could land and take off again” en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_l...

jun 19, 2025, 9:13 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Dermo @deadlocked.org

(I know it’s not exactly the same thing since the purpose is different but still: NASA were basically doing this in the 60s)

jun 19, 2025, 9:15 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Airwolf! @airwolf.bsky.social

Also, rockets that explode before liftoff technically aren’t usable, never mind reusable!

jun 19, 2025, 5:46 am • 25 0 • view
avatar
Elon The Con @elonthecon.bsky.social

Dude, they learned so much from this, you just don’t understand.

jun 19, 2025, 5:55 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Aurélien Morel (pew pews en tout genre) @aurelienmorel.bsky.social

Waiting for the people who explain that, actually, putting all of the fuel storage and explosive stuff next to where you test explosives and rocket boosters is good and a proper way to go about things.

jun 19, 2025, 9:30 am • 18 0 • view
avatar
Macro Polo @macropolo.bsky.social

Average Rhodesian idea

jun 19, 2025, 10:50 am • 9 0 • view
avatar
𝔾𝕣𝕖𝕖𝕟 ℕ𝕖𝕨 𝔻𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕊𝕦𝕡𝕡𝕠𝕣𝕥𝕖𝕣 🌹 ⚙️ 🌱 @mistermercury.bsky.social

I get having like the first few test rockets blow up but this is the THIRTY-SIXTH TEST This shit will never be fucking approved by NASA to shuttle crew even if they get it to stop blowing up, its track record is so horribly tainted by this point

jun 19, 2025, 11:29 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Shinyfailure @shinyfailure.bsky.social

Sometimes rockets, like electric cars, just explode while they’re sitting there doing nothing. Perfectly natural, even beautiful in its own way

jun 19, 2025, 7:12 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
iko @fe2o3al.com

🎶Once the rocket blows up, Who cares what it was for? That's not my department Says Elon the Boer🎶

jun 19, 2025, 4:58 am • 15 1 • view
avatar
rork310.bsky.social @rork310.bsky.social

I'd sooner sit in the MythBusters rocket chair.

jun 19, 2025, 9:00 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Nate @nastiestnate.bsky.social

Seems like ULA gets along just fine without theirs "working" this way

jun 19, 2025, 4:40 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
occupyelonsanus.bsky.social @occupyelonsanus.bsky.social

Because Elon is a fraud and has no idea what he is doing.

jun 19, 2025, 5:32 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
keithrace.bsky.social @keithrace.bsky.social

Musk did say he was going to dismantle his space ship right?

jun 19, 2025, 4:39 am • 5 0 • view
avatar
Pere Ubu, Celebrity 'Pataphysician @pereubu.bsky.social

Move Fast and Self-Disassemble

jun 19, 2025, 5:58 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
SiztaRoze @sizsta.bsky.social

If Iran has taught me anything it is Rockets go best when they go boom.

jun 19, 2025, 3:39 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Lefty Conspirator (Espen Kulseth) @leftyconspirator.bsky.social

They're setting standards, just not in the way they had expected.

jun 19, 2025, 9:35 am • 13 0 • view
avatar
Ahsoka'n Farewell @bajonista.bsky.social

Even the Rocket Science for Babies books show the rocket GOING somewhere. The last page occurs IN SPACE. I could have run a Texas-county-wide community mental health program FOR A YEAR for what that rocket cost. With competitive wages. Fuck you, Elon.

jun 19, 2025, 2:27 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Vincent Pyrmont @ida-doc.at

Only big and beautiful rockets.

jun 19, 2025, 5:30 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mitchell Horton @jarlent.bsky.social

Making excuses for rockets exploding when it's the 9th iteration of a rocket is wild

jun 19, 2025, 4:32 am • 23 0 • view
avatar
Blue Dot from BFE @bluedotfrombfe.bsky.social

Only 9th? I doubt that.

jun 19, 2025, 4:40 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
noah @nnoahh.bsky.social

i think they are confusing rockets (for space) with rockets (for war crimes)

jun 19, 2025, 5:29 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dane 🔜 DragonCon Comic and Pop Artist Alley A11 @monkeyminion.com

If NASA had blown up this many rockets at any point, congress would have shut them down in 1963.

jun 19, 2025, 4:51 am • 35 2 • view
avatar
Friendly Neighborhood Murdercat @shanzival.bsky.social

SpaceX is skipping the completely unnecessary step of learning from what happened.

jun 19, 2025, 1:56 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Matthew Orgel @punchgroin.bsky.social

I like this so much more than when my tax dollars were paying to successfully put people into space... Nasa figured out how to not blow up rockets in the fucking 60s, how is SpaceX so bad at this?

jun 19, 2025, 1:09 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
kennelproud.bsky.social @kennelproud.bsky.social

Move fast and break things make a lot more sense when your product is a widget. A lot less when it is several thousand tons of solid rocket fuel

jun 19, 2025, 2:33 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
K.R. Merrill @kayrae42.bsky.social

Even then, it depends on the purpose of the widget. Consumer safety and the move fast and break things model dont align well

jun 19, 2025, 2:59 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
michaelharris58.bsky.social @michaelharris58.bsky.social

Flux capacitor was used in a future spacecraft...

jun 19, 2025, 4:49 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Fish @fishappreciator.bsky.social

it actually felt really good for the rocket when it did that

jun 19, 2025, 4:30 am • 134 0 • view
avatar
Twisted Spinster @danceswithpugs.bsky.social

Rockets only do this when they’re in a lot of distress and frightened!

jun 19, 2025, 4:33 am • 92 2 • view
avatar
Aeryn 🖖 Part Time Ma'am @baphometta.bsky.social

And a special guest appearance by Sometimes They Just Do That!

jun 19, 2025, 6:05 am • 15 0 • view
avatar
Yeah nah, it's really fucked @nahyahnah.bsky.social

The way rockets dress causes explosions

jun 19, 2025, 6:39 am • 12 1 • view
avatar
Luke Horn @lukebro92.bsky.social

What was the rocket wearing?

jun 19, 2025, 12:35 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Yeah nah, it's really fucked @nahyahnah.bsky.social

It appeared to be a shiny grey form fitting number, it was very sleek highlighting all its attributes

jun 19, 2025, 12:38 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Luke Horn @lukebro92.bsky.social

Well the explodium just can't control itself when it sees something like that. You know how it is.

jun 19, 2025, 12:39 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Yeah nah, it's really fucked @nahyahnah.bsky.social

*nods* explodiums will be explodiums

jun 19, 2025, 12:41 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
DavidNelsonNM @davidnelsonnm.bsky.social

Even the actual Nazis, busy kinda inventing this technology while getting their asses kicked in a war, had a much better success rate. (ignoring for the moment what “success” meant)

jun 19, 2025, 6:41 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
DataportDoll @dataportdoll.bsky.social

I'm going to start telling parents their kid will be a rocket scientist as an insult.

jun 19, 2025, 4:42 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
HoldenAccountable @gifsmooth.bsky.social

Rockets actually only do that when they're VERY upset.

jun 19, 2025, 12:33 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
The World's Angriest Boy in the World @angriestboy.bsky.social

It's very good and cool that the brain genius who managed to regress rocket science by 60 years was in charge of making our already undersized federal government smaller for the sake of 'efficiency'

jun 19, 2025, 12:05 pm • 12 1 • view
avatar
The Billiam @the-billiam.bsky.social

"Move fast and break things" is techbro speak for "I don't know why things are done that way so I'm not going to do it and OH MY GOD THAT'S WHY IT'S DONE THAT WAY NOBODY COULD HAVE FORESEEN THIS DISASTER!"

jun 19, 2025, 9:46 pm • 16 1 • view
avatar
Kaitensatsuma @kaitensatsuma.bsky.social

It's a tech bro misunderstanding of rapid test cycles. You don't *want* things to break but sometimes you don't know if they'll break or not until you get the thing out

jun 19, 2025, 10:31 pm • 10 1 • view
avatar
The Billiam @the-billiam.bsky.social

All techbros think they're smarter than everyone else. To them, if *they* don't know why a process exists, then *nobody* must know why it exists. So they get rid of it. And then find out exactly why that process was put in place. Look at them begging for crypto regs after SBF scammed them all.

jun 20, 2025, 12:22 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Kaitensatsuma @kaitensatsuma.bsky.social

Just the regulations to protect their investment though! Nothing stopping them from pumping out their OWN memecoin bag swaps!

jun 20, 2025, 12:25 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
phoenixqueen12.bsky.social @phoenixqueen12.bsky.social

Yeah the point of "throw stuff at a wall and see what sticks" isn't "we want stuff to fall off the wall" it's "we want to weed out the bad options so we can focus on the good ones"

jun 20, 2025, 5:08 am • 5 0 • view
avatar
NightmareWaffle @nightmarewaffle.bsky.social

This makes a lot of sense when you consider their engineers probably learned how to build rockets from watching Twitch streamers play Kerbal Space Program.

jun 19, 2025, 5:57 am • 6 0 • view
avatar
Dr. Birgitta Hoffmann @mancent.bsky.social

That would certainly explain the failure rate.

jun 19, 2025, 6:24 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Moderately Grouchy @moderately-grouchy.bsky.social

Explosion during what was apparently still fueling is a truly strange anomaly and, superficially, I'd say might reflect on something other than the flight hardware, which may have had nothing at all to do with this

jun 19, 2025, 4:50 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Moderately Grouchy @moderately-grouchy.bsky.social

"sabotage" one option Or some truly profound test processing mistake Again none of the flight hardware that hasn't performed well would be involved in this -- offhand, completely separate kind of problem

jun 19, 2025, 4:53 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
ItsFeztho @itsfeztho.bsky.social

They are quite literally blowing up our tax dollars in our faces. Either as dumbass elon rockets or dumbass missiles to genocide brown kids. But healthcare is out of the question because there is somehow no money to pay for it

jun 19, 2025, 6:51 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
sel-bsky-social.bsky.social @sel-bsky-social.bsky.social

Although rocket science was a bit more experimental when the soviets and NASA blew up thiers

jun 19, 2025, 5:34 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
kingzaro.bsky.social @kingzaro.bsky.social

I wish I knew how rockets are supposed to work, or at least what the heck they did to blow it up. NASA did burn an Apollo crew and two shuttles but over like 50 years not almost double digit failures in 5

jun 19, 2025, 2:28 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Rich Pickins @axiomatixx.bsky.social

Well if it doesn't catch fire, how is it a static fire test? 🤪

jun 19, 2025, 5:11 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Rebecca Carter @rcartr.bsky.social

I've defended explosions before.

jun 19, 2025, 10:06 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Rusty Shackelford @pfcilng.bsky.social

image
jun 19, 2025, 7:22 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Fuzz Litebeer @badgerwthumbs.bsky.social

😂 bsky.app/profile/badg...

jun 19, 2025, 9:03 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Luckless Pedestrian @squindar.bsky.social

well, I am no expert, but they ARE designed to create a lot of fire & explosiony kind of stuff, right? But it usually comes out of the bottom of it I think.

jun 19, 2025, 6:08 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Silk Burrito @silkburrito27.bsky.social

Maybe we shouldn't "move fast and break things" if it's gonna result in a bunch of accidental fiery explosions

jun 19, 2025, 12:53 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Larry @misterkojak.bsky.social

Y'all, I'm starting to think I shouldn't have bought that plot of land on Mars he promised me

jun 19, 2025, 6:23 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
nachoseason38.bsky.social @nachoseason38.bsky.social

Totally normal for a company to spend more money on a failure than it would cost to feed a lot of hungry children, bro do you even rocket?

jun 19, 2025, 4:39 am • 8 0 • view
avatar
Makk @makkarei.bsky.social

Living up to the tradition of fascists developing new modes of transportation.

An image of the Hindenburg disaster. A zeppelin bursting into flames.
jun 19, 2025, 5:02 am • 13 0 • view
avatar
Littleweebit @littleweebit.bsky.social

Safety systems are expensive and essential. Something SpaceX and Tesla does not have.

jun 19, 2025, 1:46 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Alan Richardson @alanrichardson.bsky.social

There is way more data all over the launch site now than if it had been successful

jun 19, 2025, 5:20 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Tahfromslc @tahfromslc.bsky.social

My Dad was a rocket engineer. Worked on the lunar landing module for Apollo 11. They, at best, had rudimentary computers and slide rules. But they made it to the moon. With astronauts. Who returned. Musk is a joke.

jun 19, 2025, 5:18 am • 18 3 • view
avatar
flatline42.bsky.social @flatline42.bsky.social

The primary computer on the Apollo 11 was a fucking miracle of technology. If memory serves, it ran several virtual computers inside its memory which considering my watch has more processing power these days is a trip to think about.

jun 19, 2025, 5:36 am • 13 1 • view
avatar
Dangerouslytalented @dangrously.bsky.social

The calculations were done by women and adding machines. That's it. That's all they had. And they had women because the men considered themselves "too important" to do that kind of work. I mean, they were very eminent mathematicians, but they were still given the "worst" tasks.

jun 19, 2025, 12:30 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Igor cat @igor-kitty.bsky.social

Through the 90s I met a number of boomer men who physically recoiled from touching a keyboard. Was dying to tell them it wouldn't make them gay to hit "alt-tab." So odd to see.

jun 19, 2025, 2:12 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
flatline42.bsky.social @flatline42.bsky.social

I was thinking specifically of the AGC whose development was headed by Margaret Hamilton.

jun 19, 2025, 1:03 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Dangerouslytalented @dangrously.bsky.social

Margaret Hamilton, standing next to a stack of the computer coding her team wrote for Apollo. It is taller than her.
jun 19, 2025, 1:07 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Rafa @ewing33.bsky.social

Rockets exploding upon ignition Irish car bomb style eliminates fraud and waste!

jun 19, 2025, 4:55 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
John Magee @eugenebwhitaker.bsky.social

the whole 'move fast break shit' ethos does NOT apply to all things - you know - like government - or rocket design i would think

jun 19, 2025, 12:37 pm • 16 0 • view
avatar
dawnlaurier.bsky.social @dawnlaurier.bsky.social

From what I've seen, it only applies to things one wants ruined. The money & faith given to tech was clearly squandered.

jun 19, 2025, 1:37 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
chalupacabra🇵🇸🏳️‍⚧️ @possumancer.bsky.social

duh, every space program has a quota of sacrifices that must be made to stolas, the great prince of hell, in exchange for the knowlege of astronomy that allows us to go to space

jun 19, 2025, 4:39 am • 6 0 • view
avatar
pdxpratt @pdxpratt.bsky.social

Passed the fire test...

jun 19, 2025, 8:37 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
WalkingTaako🏴‍☠️🏳️🪣💩 @walkingtaako.bsky.social

"That's not my department"

jun 19, 2025, 5:44 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Andrew @andrewbub.bsky.social

Well, that’s one way to decommission a spacecraft.

jun 19, 2025, 6:39 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Robo Go! Go! Robo ☭🔞 @robogogorobo.bsky.social

Neither the US nor the USSR had a 90% failure rate. The single Starship that didn't blow up didn't even make a full Earth orbit. Nobody cares that Musk gets $8 million an hour from US tax payers, while delivering this.

jun 19, 2025, 4:48 am • 30 1 • view
avatar
Dangerouslytalented @dangrously.bsky.social

The rocket program that preceded the US and Soviet programs did... Perhaps he's trying to emulate them.

jun 19, 2025, 12:27 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mndrew @mndrew.bsky.social

They have indeed moved fast and broken things bigly.

jun 19, 2025, 4:56 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Wonko The Sane 🏳️‍⚧️🏳‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ @wyrdandnerdy.bsky.social

I mean rockets *do* blow up a lot. But also maybe Soace X isn't so great at the thing it does for a living? 🤷‍♂️ two-things-can-be-true, etc.

jun 19, 2025, 6:00 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Coleossus @coleosssus.bsky.social

They certainly have the “break shit” part down pat, the “move fast” part not so much. Maybe Elon should concentrate on the “move fast” part of rockets?

jun 19, 2025, 10:39 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
9muir.grimupnorth.org @9muir.grimupnorth.org

Also, everyone saying “Move fast and break things” without understanding that the whole point was that the broken things would quickly be unbroken. Blowing up massively expensive rockets is not the same thing as a website rollout.

jun 19, 2025, 12:31 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
E.H. Tentrees 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️ @pb-and-joint.bsky.social

i blame the metric system.

jun 19, 2025, 9:43 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Editor-in-Chimp @newsfedora.bsky.social

Just checked out the ongoing livestream and a lot of nervous chatter about the things they’ll learn from this to help improve the rocket going forward

jun 19, 2025, 5:25 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jean Dijon @jung-thug.bsky.social

What's really wild is that Starship has no way for the crew to escape in an emergency and so has to be basically airliner reliable if it's going to be used for crewed missions.

jun 19, 2025, 10:41 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Hexagonal Crank @hexagonalcrank.bsky.social

Look at all that data!

jun 19, 2025, 4:40 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
NeuroFellaMD 📚⚖️🗽 @melissaf.bsky.social

You’d think after almost a century we’d be improving our system that actually worked instead of using AI to reinvent the wheel and blow shit up. Musk is a fucking weapon of destruction.

jun 19, 2025, 4:33 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Jennifer Matarese @trollprincess.bsky.social

It’s a shame, you’d think it’d be okay to learn everything about rocket science from one showing of “October Sky” you watched sixteen years ago.

jun 19, 2025, 4:40 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Sleve McDichael @spacebandito.bsky.social

Honda must not know that they're doing. Their rocket yesterday didn't even explode a little bit!

jun 19, 2025, 6:34 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Kwertzy Industries @kwertzy.bsky.social

I think rockets only work when you hire competent nazis to work on them.

jun 19, 2025, 5:32 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Philphone Mike 🇨🇦 @jobengage.bsky.social

Deep State operatives are responsible don't you know!

jun 19, 2025, 12:33 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
J. Gray Dingler @jgraydingler.bsky.social

The Buzz explaining to Woody Toy Story meme with the caption:
jun 19, 2025, 4:43 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
gargwill.bsky.social @gargwill.bsky.social

Here's a super helpful post about how to go to space today: xkcd.com/1133

jun 19, 2025, 7:29 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
rosa @rosa.lesbian.cat

Elon has joined the war on Kessler syndrome on the side of Kessler syndrome

jun 19, 2025, 4:41 am • 5 0 • view
avatar
Tubbles @tubbles.bsky.social

Generally to get to Kessler syndrome the debris needs to be made in orbit, not on the launchpad. But clearly this is a bold new strategy on his part, because could the richest man in the world be a complete and utter fucking moron?

jun 19, 2025, 5:35 am • 5 0 • view
avatar
rosa @rosa.lesbian.cat

with a small investment of 200 billion dollars from the US government, inshallah the next Spaceship will explode in low orbit

jun 19, 2025, 7:04 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Willie Dustice @williedustice.bsky.social

I'm not sure the Soviets or NASA made it so routine to blow up rockets to the point that it was fully expected every time they attempted to launch.

jun 19, 2025, 4:33 am • 52 2 • view
avatar
Daron (he/him) @daronw.bsky.social

And it's important to note that rockets were relatively new then. Today we have decades of successful launches and lots of data on what works and what doesn't. To have so many failures today is in my view a lot worse than when rockets were still a new technology.

jun 19, 2025, 6:46 pm • 2 1 • view
avatar
tmoney2007.bsky.social @tmoney2007.bsky.social

Not since the 50's... So Make Rockets Explode Again? They're so obsessed to returning to the good old days...

jun 19, 2025, 5:33 am • 10 2 • view
avatar
David Quinn @davidquinn.oideachasmedia.com

Back in my day when you had a rocket it was supposed to explode not go to space

jun 19, 2025, 7:31 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
“Max” “Urai” @wezelvis.bsky.social

Early rocketry was pretty much non-stop explosions

jun 19, 2025, 11:14 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
UARTman @uartman.bsky.social

Well, there was the N1. But that was because they were making it on a shoestring budget and the best testing pipeline they could afford very much was "we launch and see what happens".

jun 19, 2025, 7:08 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Cody McElroy @codymcelroy.bsky.social

The difference between historical and what Elon is doing, that if a rocket blew up a couple of times, you canceled the rocket. How many failures has this been for Starship

jun 19, 2025, 5:11 pm • 3 1 • view
avatar
78 RPM @theemightyquinn.bsky.social

Let me explain…

jun 19, 2025, 6:20 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
peglegtricky @peglegtricky.bsky.social

Elon wants to distribute his rocketry amongst the people, in the most efficient way possible. We should be thankful that the billionaire deigned to bless us plebs with sophisticated rocketry, Robert. Trickle-down space exploration

jun 19, 2025, 6:37 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
Banned from Reddit @soldierhobo.bsky.social

I guess I am qualified for SpaceX rocket Engineer after all. Thanks Linkedln.

jun 19, 2025, 4:35 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Chuck Grape @chuckgrape.bsky.social

They're supposed to go up and you shouldn't use them when you've been drinking. Probably more them than that, but those are the two most important things to remember.

jun 19, 2025, 4:43 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Drunemeton @drunemeton.bsky.social

Oh? “No smoking during fueling” didn’t make the list?

jun 19, 2025, 5:11 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Chuck Grape @chuckgrape.bsky.social

I mean... if you're a nerd, maybe. I say smoke em if you got em.

jun 19, 2025, 5:15 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Chuck Grape @chuckgrape.bsky.social

That said: rockets are way more fun when you're drunk.

jun 19, 2025, 4:46 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mojave Marxist @desert-rat.bsky.social

I first saw the news from Tim Onion and thought it was a joke. Until now.

jun 19, 2025, 2:40 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
James (another one) 🇨🇦🇺🇦 @priznat.bsky.social

They got so much DATA! Data everywhere! Raining from the sky! Burning up the launch pad! The data! So! much! DATAAAAA! (lol)

jun 19, 2025, 4:31 am • 59 0 • view
avatar
Dr Kris Sargent @ksargent.bsky.social

That one's been so reliable! But unlike in the original comment here, this one actually blew up BEFORE the test. There is no data this time to yell about.

jun 19, 2025, 8:04 am • 6 0 • view
avatar
strayster2 @strayster2.bsky.social

But isn't 'no data' also, in itself, a kind of data? Checkmate.

jun 19, 2025, 9:16 am • 7 1 • view
avatar
Dr Kris Sargent @ksargent.bsky.social

"In this report, we have modified our goals to instead study the null condition for a rocket launch."

jun 19, 2025, 7:49 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
strayster2 @strayster2.bsky.social

🤣

jun 19, 2025, 9:45 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dangerouslytalented @dangrously.bsky.social

they will be picking up the data out of the engines of downed airliners before long

jun 19, 2025, 12:24 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dangerouslytalented @dangrously.bsky.social

You see, moving fast and breaking things is much more fun than moving slightly slower and staying intact.

jun 19, 2025, 12:21 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Scott Berfield - 🌮🌮 mundus sine caesaribus @berfield.com

I remember the Apollo program. Zero Saturn Fives blew up. Let alone sitting on the pad waiting for a static test.

jun 19, 2025, 4:12 pm • 4 1 • view
avatar
Ben Deaves @bendeaves375.bsky.social

Rocket, go up. If rocket no go up is bomb not rocket, this is the end of my ted talk

jun 19, 2025, 4:59 am • 10 0 • view
avatar
Drunemeton @drunemeton.bsky.social

jun 19, 2025, 5:08 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
hyperentity.bsky.social @hyperentity.bsky.social

rockets only do that when they're very stressed out and anxious

jun 19, 2025, 12:20 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
ʕ∩ꜞ∩ʔ @gning.bsky.social

It's true that SpaceX drove its way to industry dominance on a road paved with exploded parts, but at this point the new rocket isn't even making any forward progress. Maybe it's too big to be workable, being sized by ego rather than by demand.

jun 19, 2025, 6:47 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
ʕ∩ꜞ∩ʔ @gning.bsky.social

Being 400 feet tall makes it very difficult for it to be light enough, powerful enough, and robust enough all at the same time. The solution would be to make it smaller, which Elon won't accept.

jun 19, 2025, 6:51 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Lord Sparkinari @sparkcj.bsky.social

Spacex wants these things to be as mass producible as possible, which is a problem when the engineer requirement for some of the things, with the size of this rocket, probably are going to be more expensive. Prohibitively so. Like he wants to go to Mars by I think 5 years ago at this point

jun 19, 2025, 12:08 pm • 9 0 • view
avatar
Moonshine Fox @moonshinefox.bsky.social

I mean, he doesn’t really want to go to Mars. He just wants to be seen as some humanity saving messiah figure. Promising to colonize another planet gets him that adoration without having to actually accomplish much of anything.

jun 19, 2025, 1:47 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Lord Sparkinari @sparkcj.bsky.social

And there’s no plan for radiation shielding because he doesn’t think it’ll be a problem.

jun 19, 2025, 12:08 pm • 8 0 • view
avatar
Matthew Orgel @punchgroin.bsky.social

You mean "Mr eugenics" wants to make everyone on his Mars mission sterile?

jun 19, 2025, 1:10 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
Blackavar @blackavar-inle.bsky.social

..... *headdesk* I hate all of them so much.

jun 19, 2025, 12:18 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
The Iron Prophet @ironprophet.bsky.social

They've just been large stacks of TNT this whole time. Checkmate liberal.

jun 19, 2025, 1:55 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
traintripz.bsky.social @traintripz.bsky.social

Check out the Common Sense Skeptic series on Starship on YT.

jun 19, 2025, 5:23 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Kim Masters @kimmasters.bsky.social

Can’t wait to jump into one of Elon‘s driverless taxis.

jun 19, 2025, 6:17 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
Andy @aestro.bsky.social

One day mankind will go to space

jun 19, 2025, 5:43 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Damien Miller @damienmiller.bsky.social

They only do this when they are extremely distressed

jun 19, 2025, 4:35 am • 7 0 • view
avatar
Catherine Berry @isomeme.bsky.social

"This kind of experience is necessary for her learning." 😁🎵🔥 music.youtube.com/watch?v=fbU1...

jun 19, 2025, 5:29 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
turtlyburtly @turtlyburtly.bsky.social

✨efficiency✨

jun 19, 2025, 3:25 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Brian @bwnash.bsky.social

This is part of a $4b NASA contract to land a crewed mission on the moon. We literally paid for every dime of this. What is this now? 5 of the last 9 Starships? With only two more Hohmann orbit launch windows before 2030?

jun 19, 2025, 11:43 am • 9 0 • view
avatar
Mr. Pig @mr-pig.bsky.social

Are you saying that private enterprise isn't being more efficient than a well funded and carefully planned government initiative?

jun 19, 2025, 4:41 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Brian @bwnash.bsky.social

Heresy!

jun 19, 2025, 4:43 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mr. Pig @mr-pig.bsky.social

St. Reagan is shaking his head.

jun 19, 2025, 4:53 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
mach01-1.bsky.social @mach01-1.bsky.social

to be that guy, it’s not true that we paid for every dime of this. the 4 billion dollars is exclusively for the HLS lander variant and tied to milestones. Starship itself is mostly private cash and they’ve already spent 5-10 billion dollars of it.

jun 19, 2025, 12:02 pm • 8 0 • view
avatar
Brian @bwnash.bsky.social

No, thank you for the correction. I assumed booster and lander were the same contract.

jun 19, 2025, 12:06 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
Deadling @deadling.bsky.social

Elon obviously learned from the last 3. Those all blew up mid-air. NOW, they blow up on the ground.

jun 19, 2025, 5:32 am • 6 0 • view
avatar
lakeshoredriver.bsky.social @lakeshoredriver.bsky.social

It _is_ a much smaller debris field.

jun 19, 2025, 1:37 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
aloraanophis.bsky.social @aloraanophis.bsky.social

Pro tip for Elon Musk: Let Grok design the next iteration of Starship. Please AI is the future, RIGHT ELON?

Timmy Turner praying at his bed
jun 19, 2025, 4:45 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
kat @oedipalized.bsky.social

you know we had a good thing going with the saturn V rocket

jun 19, 2025, 4:34 am • 5 0 • view
avatar
Chuck Stove @realchuckbass.bsky.social

It's basically premature ejaculation for rockets and we don't need to worry, it just happens sometimes

jun 19, 2025, 5:32 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Poetry Of Unguided Descent @venticulardrop.bsky.social

it made sense for the rockets to blow up earlier but those problems are supposed to end and then if they start up again from a different problem in an unrelated system where as starship...just keeps blowing up elon just cant handle build quality it seems

jun 19, 2025, 7:10 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Poetry Of Unguided Descent @venticulardrop.bsky.social

not to belabor the point but this is literally the same core problem as what feynman said about Challenger which, as most people do not remember, was actually going up in part because reagan wanted to commercialize the space program and get rid of nasa

jun 19, 2025, 7:13 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
John Robie @jrobie.bsky.social

"Now ideally - and I can't stress this enough - you want that explosion coming out of the bottom of your rocketship rather than the top, middle, and sides..."

jun 19, 2025, 5:31 am • 44 0 • view
avatar
Pere Ubu, Celebrity 'Pataphysician @pereubu.bsky.social

I mean, *really*, this IS the description of a rocket engine; John D. Clark mentions this quite a bit in "Ignition!".

jun 19, 2025, 6:04 am • 5 0 • view
avatar
Wonko The Sane 🏳️‍⚧️🏳‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ @wyrdandnerdy.bsky.social

Lol

jun 19, 2025, 6:01 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
eeeeeva.bsky.social @eeeeeva.bsky.social

It’s literally the xkcd joke lol

image
jun 19, 2025, 9:15 am • 29 1 • view
avatar
Starshark @starshark.bsky.social

Easy to forget. I won’t Monday quarterback.

jun 19, 2025, 5:50 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Spectre of Marxism Future @marxistlore.bsky.social

This is how I want any rocket with Musk or Bezos on it to work

jun 19, 2025, 2:44 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Rebecca Ferrenz @beccamonster.bsky.social

After that, they can explain why it's good actually to put dozens of fuel tanks right next to where the rockets blow up

jun 19, 2025, 7:48 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
mach01-1.bsky.social @mach01-1.bsky.social

no space to put it further back. the whole site is 4-5 little outposts all surrounded by protected wetlands. the logic is probably that ground explosions aren’t supposed to happen and if they do, the damage to the stand is a bigger problem than replacing some pretty cheap fuel tanks

Aerial photo of Massey’s Outpost, the test facility where the explosion happened, showing that it is surrounded on four sides by water and protected wetlands.
jun 19, 2025, 12:22 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Dr. Birgitta Hoffmann @mancent.bsky.social

This was a static fire test? Did this happen during assembly or after countdown? Asking because there are a lot of people working on the pads during assembly. Is everyone accounted for?

jun 19, 2025, 6:22 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
brittdogg.bsky.social @brittdogg.bsky.social

Everyone is OK according to SpaceX www.valleycentral.com/news/local-n...

jun 19, 2025, 8:55 am • 1 0 • view