be fair. W admitted, albeit freudian, that iraq was over how his daddy looked after the first one. as far as afghanistan is concerned, that’s a time-bomb that had been ticking since the ‘70s. and to be more fair, the democrats are no different in their interventionism, at least, not significantly.

hard to find a democrat led military intervention that would match Iraq or Afghanistan

what about Korea!? what about the Bay of Pigs!? Vietnam!? the iran affair!?

that is much older story, I see no reason to pretend those actions have much to do with people who are now in Democratic party. also, you would like to have all Koreans to be under Kim's rule?

you should go back to your safe space. you’re as bad as the MAGAkkkultists. ignore anything that doesn’t support your preferred narrative.

you ignore the fact that since decades wars that US initiated were started by republicans

no, i don’t. all i said is dems are no less likely to engage in interventionism. we can also point to the billions spent half-assing support for Ukraine and the billions per year spent subsidizing the holocaust israel has been committing.

> no less likely to engage in interventionism You still won't find any demorcatic-led intervention in recent decades that would be on scale of Iraq or Afghanistan. And that means the claim there is no difference is simply not true.

obama was in iraq and afghanistan for longer than bush was. biden was as much of a sycophantic panty-dropper to the false messiah bibi the butcher as trump is.

He didn't start it. You would like them to just pull out from Iraq and Afghanistan without any consideration for consequences? You want to claim that Biden was just as approving of Israel as Trump with his "let's cleanse that land of Palestinians and build hotels there". BS.

slap my ass and call me sally, there’s something special in hitting the precise character count.