The comments, which amount to a peer review of a scientific assessment that itself did NOT undergo peer review, notes “pervasive problems with misrepresentation and selective citation of the scientific literature” 3/
The comments, which amount to a peer review of a scientific assessment that itself did NOT undergo peer review, notes “pervasive problems with misrepresentation and selective citation of the scientific literature” 3/
For example, the comments fault the report for failing to note the acceleration in sea level rise, and for faulting climate models when in fact they have matched up well with reality www.cnn.com/2025/09/02/c... 4/4