avatar
Kristian G. Andersen @kgandersen.bsky.social

The bigger issue, Jon, is that the article was written as if we exist in a complete data vacuum and that nobody has analyzed any of the data even they mention.

aug 27, 2025, 10:15 pm • 13 0

Replies

avatar
Zach Hensel @zachhensel.bsky.social

The idea that "China" can provide evidence that would rule out a lab origin is undercut by not having a testable theory that can even specify which lab. You'd never know reading this article that Relman was a Mojiang mine conspiracy theorist and that his favored conspiracy theory was disproven.

image
aug 28, 2025, 5:48 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Zach Hensel @zachhensel.bsky.social

Folks demanding data should be able to demonstrate a track record of acting on it or at least say precisely what they'll do with the data. Not even close in this case.

aug 28, 2025, 5:48 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Zach Hensel @zachhensel.bsky.social

Two slides later we find out what happens when "China" does publish data and it doesn't point to a lab leak. Relman amplifies some nonsense from a snake oil salesman and someone else who thinks SARS2 started in a lab in the USA, who speculate the data must be fake.

image
aug 28, 2025, 5:51 pm • 4 0 • view