She just explained it very succinctly for you in 1 1/2 minutes. “Plausible” is the rights asserted by the applicant (S. Africa), not the substance of their case.
Replies
Then maybe you don't understand words. So stop acting like you've discovered a checkmate. She 'succinctly' said the Palestinian right (not the SA right to assert) to be protected from genocide had been plausibly put at risk. So how? In what way?
jun 22, 2025, 12:55 pm • 0 0 • view