I'm being 100% serious right now: go back and read that "spark of humanity" skeet and ask yourself if "He's saying LLMs have a spark of humanity" is an accurate or fair summary of it. Answer key: it is not.
Replies
It's literally in a subordinate clause talking about *an argument that machines can't think* (gesturing broadly at the Searle/Dennet Chinese Room discourse) and saying that that argument raises questions about how we should think about ourselves. He's right! It does! We've spent centuries on them!
aug 10, 2025, 11:57 pm • 0 0 • view