avatar
The Unfinished @theunfinished.bsky.social

That makes theoretical sense. But, compositionally it's terrible. The background's fussy and bleeds into the foreground in a very messy way.

aug 18, 2025, 8:58 am • 1 0

Replies

avatar
Rob Manuel @robmanuelyeah.bsky.social

Well it passes the unofficial B3ta test, which is: does it turn up regularly photoshopped in our challenges? And it does, which only happens to memorable album covers.

aug 18, 2025, 9:01 am • 8 0 • view
avatar
The Unfinished @theunfinished.bsky.social

Oh, there's no doubt it's iconic.

aug 18, 2025, 9:25 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
christhebarker @christhebarker.bsky.social

Yes, but it could've been better.

aug 18, 2025, 9:03 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jim-bob @jimbob-a.bsky.social

I see what you mean; on the Back Catalogue listing you hardly notice the fire any more, it's too small a detail in the context of the wider picture. The other images are more simplistically effective

Pink Floyd Back Catalogue - the poster every teenage boy in the '90s wanted (basically a load of bare ladies' backs & bums)
aug 19, 2025, 3:50 pm • 0 0 • view