That makes theoretical sense. But, compositionally it's terrible. The background's fussy and bleeds into the foreground in a very messy way.
That makes theoretical sense. But, compositionally it's terrible. The background's fussy and bleeds into the foreground in a very messy way.
Well it passes the unofficial B3ta test, which is: does it turn up regularly photoshopped in our challenges? And it does, which only happens to memorable album covers.
Oh, there's no doubt it's iconic.
Yes, but it could've been better.
I see what you mean; on the Back Catalogue listing you hardly notice the fire any more, it's too small a detail in the context of the wider picture. The other images are more simplistically effective