I think you need to specify who you're calling "anti-Democrats sons of bitches". A lot of people seem to be under the impression that you're talking about rightists, who barely have a presence here, rather than anti-Democratic party leftists.
Replies
He’s blocking people for questioning Jeffries’ decision to call the military deployed in American cities a “distraction” It’s not anti-Dem leftists, it’s anyone who doesn’t treat Dem leadership as an unquestionable cult People like this guy do more harm than good
aug 24, 2025, 7:49 pm • 1 0 • view
Yeah, I think he's definitely talking about people like you.
aug 25, 2025, 5:13 pm • 3 1 • view
I’m a registered Dem voter I voted for Harris, and I’d like to see more Dems elected By ridiculing and exiling anyone who dares ask if Dem leadership could be more effective, idiots like Texas Paul are making people less likely to support Dems, and it’s infuriating
aug 25, 2025, 5:41 pm • 1 0 • view
I don't think that whatsoever. People who are mad at him that he's talking about didn't vote anyways so fuck them. They're the whole reason we are in this mess.
aug 25, 2025, 7:31 pm • 1 0 • view
He’s talking about me, a person who’s mad AND who voted So what do you think will help Dems with voters: A) do what I suggest and listen to criticisms of leadership B) do what Texas Pete says and tell people with legitimate criticisms that they should f*ck off for daring to question Dear Leader
aug 25, 2025, 8:22 pm • 2 0 • view
Look, I'm with Pete 100% on this. Trying to convince everyone to poo poo someone who is actually getting somewhere by treating the current administration like the cunts they are... Nobody else is nearly as effective. Let the man fucking cook
aug 26, 2025, 12:25 am • 0 0 • view
It's the one thing that has gotten MAGA to stop clamoring for the Epstein files. Trump is throwing Black people to the wolves, and you all object to a Black man calling it out for the distraction it is. Why? who are you trying to protect?
aug 24, 2025, 7:57 pm • 3 0 • view
If you call it a distraction, then you’ve created an excuse for why you’ve done nothing to oppose it How is throwing Black people to the wolves merely a “distraction?” It should be a primary focus, not something to be minimized!
aug 24, 2025, 8:02 pm • 1 0 • view
You can call military deployment in Black-led majority Dem cities a clearly racist and fascist consolidation of authoritarian white supremacy, or you can call it a “distraction” If someone chooses to call it a “distraction,” you should be asking THEM who they’re trying to protect
aug 24, 2025, 8:12 pm • 0 0 • view
You are absolutely intentionally missing the point. You know precisely what they mean when they say that. Trump is 100% trying to use this as a distraction from the Epstein files while buying time for Steven Miller to do what he's doing. He knows Dems will be caught up with lawsuits. But you already
aug 25, 2025, 5:15 pm • 1 1 • view
Rep. Ann Johnson gets it THIS is the fire we need from party leaders, not the confused messaging we’re getting bsky.app/profile/clar...
aug 25, 2025, 5:49 pm • 1 0 • view
The people who are claiming it's not a distraction are denying the fact that Trump is throwing Black people to the wolves to distract from the Epstein files, so I know they're not trying to protect me.
aug 25, 2025, 12:49 am • 0 0 • view
They’re saying it’s MORE than just a distraction You recognize that minimizing it as a “distraction” downplays the seriousness of what’s happening, and downplays the racism and authoritarianism that are motivating it? That by calling it a “distraction” it becomes a thing that can be ignored?
aug 25, 2025, 3:02 am • 0 0 • view
As racist and dangerous as It is, it was intended as a distraction, so it's a distraction. The right is going to minimize it regardless. Who else is going to use the fact that it's a distraction as an excuse to minimize it?
aug 25, 2025, 3:40 am • 0 0 • view