avatar
Nils Kroemer @nbkroemer.bsky.social

New preprint...and this one is truly EPIC 🚨. Using a large group of patients with depression and healthy controls (N>800), we show differences in the functional segregation of insular subnetworks. And we can use it to classify! Led by @glassybrain.bsky.social #neuroskyence 🩺 osf.io/preprints/ps...

Graphical summary of the analysis pipeline Decreased similarity within the anterior insula cortex drives group differences between patients with MDD and healthy control participants. This difference is illustrated by shift functions and compared to control regions in the temporal cortex. Patients with depression can be robustly classified based on functional connectivity profiles, and the accuracy improves with increasing symptom severity.
aug 30, 2025, 8:30 am • 93 27

Replies

avatar
Matt Wall @mattwall.bsky.social

Wow - incredible work!šŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘

sep 1, 2025, 9:47 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
dickretired @dickretired.bsky.social

Great work. It would be interesting to know if you get similar results (as in MDD) for healthy controls if you ask them to think sad thoughts, think of sad memories,or listen to sad music etc.

aug 30, 2025, 11:26 am • 5 0 • view
avatar
Nils Kroemer @nbkroemer.bsky.social

Thank you. It is a great idea to estimate the state component in healthy participants. In our fMRI studies, we usually collect mood ratings before and after the scan, but we typically manipulate mood only indirectly. Will keep this in mind (and maybe someone has good data on it).

aug 31, 2025, 2:01 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
dickretired @dickretired.bsky.social

I say this because when Drevets showed abnormal activation in the subgenual cortex in depression, my memory (and it may be wrong) is that someone showed you could get the same results by asking healthy people to think sad thoughts.

sep 1, 2025, 9:45 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
dickretired @dickretired.bsky.social

John Teasdale worked a long time ago on manipulating mood in healthy people by playing some slowed up music. This was not in fMRI. But my point is: are the results on MDD simply due to the fact that they are thinking sad thoughts? Of course they may not be, but it would be worth ruling it out.

sep 1, 2025, 9:42 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Nils Kroemer @nbkroemer.bsky.social

Yeah, I agree. There are many mood induction studies, but to the best of my knowledge, I am not aware of a similar analysis, so it is definitely worth looking into this.

sep 1, 2025, 9:47 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Micah G. Allen @micahgallen.com

this is so cool! I wanted to try exactly this kind of analysis since the postdoc days. Well done!

aug 30, 2025, 8:31 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Nils Kroemer @nbkroemer.bsky.social

Thanks! I don't want to say how long it took us to finish the paper 🫠. It would be nice to see how well it replicates across samples as well.

aug 31, 2025, 1:57 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Micah G. Allen @micahgallen.com

We should definitely try this in the VMP, I’m sure we can benefit from your experience!

aug 31, 2025, 2:17 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
PessoaBrain @pessoabrain.bsky.social

Definitely need to take a look, did you parcellate based on gyri??

aug 30, 2025, 1:01 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Nils Kroemer @nbkroemer.bsky.social

We use (normalized) voxels and the Hammers atlas, not individual vertices. There are concerns about spurious correlations in surface-based analysis, so ours is comparatively straightforward (using the default CONN pipeline). direct.mit.edu/imag/article...

aug 30, 2025, 3:46 pm • 2 0 • view