He seems like someone making fallacious arguments from a place of and insistent on intellectual purity, while attempting to shame people to support So him insisting we demand purity, when we demand moral consistency and people to uphold human rights universally(in a consistent way) is pretty funny

Oh yeah, any of these dipshits accusing us of purity testing when we demand opposition to genocide are always, invariably doing partisan purity testing themselves "Vote blue no matter who" is on its face a purity thing

Absolutely. I'm pragmatic it'snot about purity. I just expect moral consistency. Dems can't expect to be taken seriously about defending democracy or the rule of law or human rights n dignity when they don't uphold those principles themselves

A hypocritical one, at that, as the DNC doesn't want to endorse - as one current example - Mamdani in NYC's mayoral race. He's running "blue," so why don't established Dems practice what they preach?

Because they are all sick perverted fucks they think they can do whatever they want

I assume they've all been watching the republicans have fun embracing hypocrisy as they turn overtly fascist and have gotten jealous and excited to try it themselves

I wonder if there is any historical precedent for liberals tripping over themselves to help usher in fascist tyranny, while finger wagging the left

I will ask you a direct question - are you better off under Trump than you would have been under Kamala? Would you be better off under Trump than under Newsome? These are the real world decisions, unless another option with a shot of WINNING appears.

My dude your dumb ass sitting here and defending newsom makes it increasingly likely he will be taken seriously as a candidate when he will lose. You don't care about beating trump you care about being correct. It's about ideological purity for you. So you double down and triple down

Do you think our lives get better if democrats start adopting MAGA attitudes towards our rights, yes or no? www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

The answer is no. It's also bad for society n the democrats as a party. I won't comment on the half a dozen logical fallacies in that person's one statement. Or all the liberal anti-intellectualism. All these democrat defenders have left is to behave like maga

Absolutely not. So, how does that relate to refusing to fight a fascist regime that is currently deporting dozens of unaccompanied children under 10 to Guatemala? That is a critical and immediate crisis. One sentence please if we are being pedantic.

That guy, who you allege is fighting a fascist regime, has spent months hanging out with MAGA pundits and agreeing with them about trans rights. bsky.app/profile/lady...

For my edification - ID someone holding power in the US who is doing anything to resist Trump. I’m not interested in those with no power to affect things. They are irrelevant at the moment.

Who are you talking about? Do you think propagandists, whose job it is to sway public opinion, have no power to affect things? Does Newsom have power to affect things? Are you aware of just how many liberals have taken his agreement with Charlie Kirk as carte blanche to accept MAGA positions on us?

I stopped reading after "better off with Trump" because I have seen and replied to this exact shit one hundred trillion times already

Then vote for Republicans and we can all get the best for us.

Stunning voter outreach

Voter outreach isn’t my job at present. I just try and throw a bucket over cold water over self obsessed delusions about our incredibly dire and worsening situation. If people can’t see, then they need waking up.

That's cool that you're defending losers and think it's offer people who are self obsessed and deluded

Yeah, just gonna go ahead and mute you without reading, useless liberal number one hundred trillion and one

BYE