avatar
Kevin Bird @stairwaytokevin.bsky.social

It’s kind of like an extreme form of an ecotype. I’m of two minds about it. It’s certainly fine to have functional categories for many fields (ecology, physiology, etc), but for evolutionary studies I’m a pretty staunch proponents of classifications based on ancestry.

aug 27, 2025, 11:40 am • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Kevin Bird @stairwaytokevin.bsky.social

If it wasn’t for all the mess it’d introduce to past literature I’d be for revising as many polyphyletic taxa as possible, including my beloved Brassica

aug 27, 2025, 11:41 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
spherical-cow.bsky.social @spherical-cow.bsky.social

Obligatory XKCD.

image
aug 27, 2025, 12:31 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
spherical-cow.bsky.social @spherical-cow.bsky.social

On that topic, how do farmers keep pollinators from cross fertilizing the various cultivars and accidentally breeding cabbage-kale, or something?

aug 27, 2025, 12:36 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kevin Bird @stairwaytokevin.bsky.social

I haven’t seen major commercial operations. I’d imagine the fields are just far enough apart? In field trials I believe they put nets over plots so less cross-fertilization happens but that feels too onerous at commercial scale.

aug 27, 2025, 2:48 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
spherical-cow.bsky.social @spherical-cow.bsky.social

I wonder about improving density and yields by splicing in genes that make them incompatible, in effect forcing speciation.

aug 27, 2025, 2:56 pm • 0 0 • view