Interesting! www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...
Interesting! www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...
Huh. I could not find it. Read it though. At no point did it say that Ukraine should disarm. In fact, the article is eerily prescient in regards to how the war is playing out. And the US does have a terrible tract record in regard to meddling with other countries *Iran*. I do disagree about NATO.
I personally think Ukraine should be a NATO member, and that in so doing would have prevented the war. But Bernie is an Anti-War guy. Always has been.
«I am extremely concerned when I hear the familiar drumbeats in Washington, the bellicose rhetoric that gets amplified before every war» Seriously?
Plus their letter, and the public appearances.
Being «antiwar» whatever that means does not come with a voucher for exterminating Ukrainians. Bernie may even be a carnivore but is it an excuse to slaughter and cook swans in a Central Park?
His framing Ukrainian choices as bellicose, blaming Ukraine for the russian army 7-year war and plunder is as much anti-war as Elon's crash and burn is government efficiency.
You need to brush up on your geography if you think D.C. is in Ukraine. But if we are using quotes, here is one from the same article:
“In my view, we must unequivocally support the sovereignty of Ukraine and make clear that the international community will impose severe consequences on Putin and his associates if he does not change course.”
Seriously. Look at the major kerfuffle the war in the middle east was. Lives lost, money wasted in Afghanistan for it to be exactly the same as it was before we invaded. I’ll remind you was a situation we helped create by supporting the Taliban in the first place.
Connect the dots for me, cause I'm confused. Because of the russian occupation of Afghanistan it is prudent for Ukraine to be occupied by the russian? Cause I don't get how Ukraine has to pay in blood for Bernie's exotic religious practices, antiwar or what it's called.
Mayhaps you need to unconnect some dots and step away from the internet. But sure, I’ll explain. The US has a long history of making things worse by getting involved. We supported the Taliban then 9/11 happened. Sanders was calling for diplomacy, not the deaths of Ukrainians.
Not true though is it? If you take someone's shit and want to quit, you're meant to put that shit back. You sure-ill-explainer punks gotta turn out your pockets, shake your aunts, gramps and steal jewelry from the family tombs — and pay up your debt to Ukraine before talking that big English.
3rd largest nuclear arsenal it was when you peace love hippies turned up, 3rd largest nuclear arsenal it must be when you wanna breeze out. Then you can love your the russian pals in every position, no one cares. For now owe us a huge debt so keep it tidy and polite, illiterate arse bums.
On this, we agree. The world owes Ukrainians a huge debt. And the fact this administration is abandoning them is treason.
The world fucks goats. I am taking Americans taking our nukes, and then piping their cute mouths talking how dots are connected too much for their school-shooting tastes.
Yes. We did not honor the Budapest agreement. Nor should that had ever been made in the first place. Hindsight: Nato membership should have been the solution.