avatar
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Blade Wielding Bisexual (Lordean arc) @shengokai.bsky.social

Most folks who do not study social media and digital content wholistically do not understand the environmental impact of generating and circulating digital content. Indeed, the very idea that the average consumption of digital content accounts for 40% of our carbon budget gets lost in the discourse.

aug 24, 2025, 6:48 am • 60 13

Replies

avatar
cartoon dog gf @jazzpomegranate.com

i took a class on this shit and it was like opening the ark of the covenant

aug 24, 2025, 6:54 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Tom Whittington 🇺🇦🇹🇼 🇨🇦🤝🇺🇸 @tomwwhittington.bsky.social

paper doesn’t make the claims you suggest. Yes the use of the internet is a lot of electricity, but electricity is the fastest-decarbonizing sector in the world. It’s far less plausible to cut off internet usage to an appreciable level than it is to imagine generating electricity sustainably

aug 24, 2025, 12:59 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tom Whittington 🇺🇦🇹🇼 🇨🇦🤝🇺🇸 @tomwwhittington.bsky.social

What? US carbon footprint is 25% electricity. Maybe your “budget” is something else, but even if every bit of electricity went into making YouTube it wouldn’t come close to 40%. This entire comment is nonsense.

aug 24, 2025, 12:51 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Blade Wielding Bisexual (Lordean arc) @shengokai.bsky.social

This isn't that distinct from other technologies: electric vehicles, for example, had an outsized impact on the environment due to their reliance upon rare earth minerals until more sustainable (by which I mean less damaging) methods of battery production matured.

aug 24, 2025, 6:48 am • 34 1 • view
avatar
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Blade Wielding Bisexual (Lordean arc) @shengokai.bsky.social

The primary difference is that the people demanding more data centers aren't looking for a solution. Indeed, their actions demonstrate that they give a fraction of a fuck about the impact of their technologies on our planet and they leverage public opinion (like yours) to this benefit.

aug 24, 2025, 6:48 am • 36 0 • view
avatar
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Blade Wielding Bisexual (Lordean arc) @shengokai.bsky.social

Thus, to answer your question, it is not different ecologically and by all rights should be placed under the same scrutiny as datacenters for LLMs and other AI technologies. The main difference is SOCIALLY where public awareness of the ecological impact of these technologies is concerned.

aug 24, 2025, 6:48 am • 34 0 • view
avatar
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Blade Wielding Bisexual (Lordean arc) @shengokai.bsky.social

Insofar as our understanding of the ecological harms of technology is filtered through our social understanding of the value of that technology, it's omnipresence in our lives, the ecological harm of streaming media, social media, and other ICTs is easy to overlook in comparison to the harms of AI.

aug 24, 2025, 6:48 am • 26 1 • view
avatar
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Blade Wielding Bisexual (Lordean arc) @shengokai.bsky.social

Thus, the ubiquity, and the imposition of the technology into EVERY SECTOR has resulted in a social context where we are examining the ecological cost of this Valen-forsaken technology. Had social media not wrecked our democracy, I'm sure that its environmental impact would be more common knowldge.

aug 24, 2025, 6:48 am • 32 3 • view
avatar
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Blade Wielding Bisexual (Lordean arc) @shengokai.bsky.social

Oh, and here's a fun resource for y'all.

aug 24, 2025, 6:48 am • 50 14 • view