The fact that you have to ask what the “tangible benefits of solidarity,” are as if the whole Civil Rights movement wasn’t an interracial and interfaith solidarity movement, leads me to question the degree to which you are “a serious person.”
The fact that you have to ask what the “tangible benefits of solidarity,” are as if the whole Civil Rights movement wasn’t an interracial and interfaith solidarity movement, leads me to question the degree to which you are “a serious person.”
We don’t means test human rights. Your solidarity shouldn’t be contingent on a cost benefit analysis but on a recognition of our shared humanity. How about we start there?