I reject the characterization. 1) I never said it would be rosy, functional, or clean. Only that it could result in an Iran without nukes or theocratic rule. 2) It’s feasible that if Iran isn’t overseeing a proxy war with Israel/Saudis, that the region could shift to trade, alliances, climate, etc.

Like I wrote, Panglossian Zionism. We heard the same litany in 2003.

The US didn’t know about Fordow in 2003, nor did they have the MOP/capacity to destroy the complex (and entire program) like they did this week. The theocratic regime have never been challenged in such a direct, decisive way. It could lead to a crack down or an uprising and rejection of theocracy.

You couldn't connect 2003 to the invasion of Iraq, you seem to be unaware of the 1980-88 Iraq-Iran War, and just regurgitate regime change -propaganda. Bot-like behaviour.

Fact is, this is uncharted waters - and you’re a fool if you can’t see that. The seal’s broken. After this, the US/Israel will never allow them to build a bomb, atrack bases, close Hormuz, etc Nope. So maybe the Iranian ppl will choose peace over the regime’s obsession with proxy war, nukes, etc.