It doesn't make sense to you that you can't demand others sacrifice their civil and human rights to a 'lesser evil' when you say you won't sacrifice any rights to that 'lesser evil'?
It doesn't make sense to you that you can't demand others sacrifice their civil and human rights to a 'lesser evil' when you say you won't sacrifice any rights to that 'lesser evil'?
I'll give you theee choices: vote for the fascist, vote for the Democrat almost-fascist who promises to take away *your* rights specifically, or not vote for either. Which do you choose?
This is really well put, I'm gonna use this
Hopefully those aren’t the only choices. Forget Newsom, don’t you think mist dems are more for trans rights? And when I said none I was talking about your rights also, not just mine.
The whole thread started by noting Newsom is anti-trans. The discussion behind it is how Dems are pushing people to agree to vote for him even now years before the primary.
I had no idea how anti-trans Gavin Newsom was when I posted that. I think its something that more people should know. Thank you for explaining.
And thank you for understanding and learning about his bigotry. If he can effectively fight Trump, good. But he's unsuitable as a future candidate.
None of us should have to sacrifice our rights. What ever happened to the Constitution?
Republicans and Third Way liberals decided it didn't apply to cases of marginalized people they think are 'icky' or 'lesser'