Do they insinuate a miscarriage of justice? 🤔 I’m not really doubting the court judgment. I just don’t want to imagine anyone is capable of such heinous crimes! 😢 Apparently, she wanted to attract the attention of a married consultant.
Do they insinuate a miscarriage of justice? 🤔 I’m not really doubting the court judgment. I just don’t want to imagine anyone is capable of such heinous crimes! 😢 Apparently, she wanted to attract the attention of a married consultant.
I would urge you to watch it and read the assessment in Private Eye. The non-defence of the defendant was appalling.
Private eye did a huge 24 part work out on this. I assume this gave ITV the head start. It rather begins to look as if the authorities fingered the nurse and then worked backwards to make the evidence fit, rather than see where the evidence took them. bsky.app/profile/priv...
This theory is pure conjecture - she's a single girl so must have just wanted a man. There was not a shred of evidence to show this.
Nope, they bring out the opinion of a team of experts that have again looked at the medical notes of all babies. Why do you assume Lucy Letby wanted the attention of a married consultant? Is that some weird male phantasy?
There was a transcript from her trial when she seemed to “break down” when one particular doctor was testifying. They have to make sure of guilt because she is serving a very long sentence forever.
Given that the trial took almost a year, an occasional breakdown should be expected. To tie it to ‘a particular doctor’ seem evidence of a very active imagination. Better stick to known facts.